2021
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.608567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Neuromorphic MNIST Neuromorphic? Analyzing the Discriminative Power of Neuromorphic Datasets in the Time Domain

Abstract: A major characteristic of spiking neural networks (SNNs) over conventional artificial neural networks (ANNs) is their ability to spike, enabling them to use spike timing for coding and efficient computing. In this paper, we assess if neuromorphic datasets recorded from static images are able to evaluate the ability of SNNs to use spike timings in their calculations. We have analyzed N-MNIST, N-Caltech101 and DvsGesture along these lines, but focus our study on N-MNIST. First we evaluate if additional informati… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare models using FS and FR coding schemes on classification tasks. We avoid using unrealistic datasets, such as N-MNIST (Orchard et al, 2015 ) and CIFAR10-DVS (Li et al, 2017 ), in which the first spike is not meaningful because events are generated by moving neuromorphic device around static images and there are no significant temporal differences in their sequences (Iyer et al, 2021 ). Instead, we test our model on realistic datasets in which important information is encoded in spike timings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare models using FS and FR coding schemes on classification tasks. We avoid using unrealistic datasets, such as N-MNIST (Orchard et al, 2015 ) and CIFAR10-DVS (Li et al, 2017 ), in which the first spike is not meaningful because events are generated by moving neuromorphic device around static images and there are no significant temporal differences in their sequences (Iyer et al, 2021 ). Instead, we test our model on realistic datasets in which important information is encoded in spike timings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the learning mechanism is devoid of a teacher signal, i.e., completely unsupervised, using which a spatiotemporal spiking pattern buried in noise can be spontaneously detected. In a recent study [45], the performance of ANNs, rate-coded SNNs, and time-coded SNNs was empirically evaluated using conventional benchmark tasks. Both rate-coded and time-coded SNNs perform well on conventional two-dimensional benchmark tasks, where inputs have information in the spatial dimensions alone (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both rate-coded and time-coded SNNs perform well on conventional two-dimensional benchmark tasks, where inputs have information in the spatial dimensions alone (e.g. MNIST image classification [12], [45]). However, in tasks with spatiotemporal inputs, such as gesture classification (DVS gesture [46]), the performance of time-coded SNNs was demonstrated to be superior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MNIST is a database that has been widely used to evaluate the ability of NNs to undergo supervised learning. [ 227 ] MNIST consists of 28 × 28 pixel images of handwritten digits, 60 000 for training and 10 000 for testing. [ 228 ] To test an ANN that uses multilayer perceptrons, each image of 28 × 28 pixels is converted to 784 inputs and transmitted to the input neurons, and through the hidden layers that are composed of fully‐connected hidden neurons, then output to the output layer that is composed of 10 neurons that represent digits 0–9.…”
Section: Neuromorphic Skin That Uses Artificial Synapses For Memory A...mentioning
confidence: 99%