2021
DOI: 10.1007/jhep02(2021)073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is N = 2 Large?

Abstract: We study θ dependence of the vacuum energy for the 4d SU(2) pure Yang-Mills theory by lattice numerical simulations. The response of topological excitations to the smearing procedure is investigated in detail, in order to extract topological information from smeared gauge configurations. We determine the first two coefficients in the θ expansion of the vacuum energy, the topological susceptibility χ and the first dimensionless coefficient b2, in the continuum limit. We find consistency of the SU(2) results wit… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We however explicitly note that the accuracy is still not high enough to exclude possible unconventional scenarios like the one put-forward in ref. [74], or to better investigate if critical corrections emerge at small N [75].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We however explicitly note that the accuracy is still not high enough to exclude possible unconventional scenarios like the one put-forward in ref. [74], or to better investigate if critical corrections emerge at small N [75].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large-N c topological susceptibity has also been studied through the θ-dependence in Refs. [118][119][120], and in lower dimensional theories in Refs. [121,122].…”
Section: Topological Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We however explicitly note that the accuracy is still not high enough to exclude possible unconventional scenarios like the one put-forward in Ref. [74], or to better investigate if critical corrections emerge at small N [75].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%