2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12862-016-0671-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is multiple nest building an adequate strategy to cope with inter-species nest usurpation?

Abstract: BackgroundBlack sparrowhawks (Accipiter melanoleucus) recently colonised the Cape Peninsula, South Africa, where the species faces competition for their nest sites from Egyptian geese (Alopochen aegyptiaca) which frequently usurp black sparrowhawk nests. In this paper, we test the hypothesis that multiple nest building by black sparrowhawks is a strategy to cope with this competitor, based on a 14-year long term data set.ResultsTwo main results support the hypothesis: first, the numbers of intact nests per bre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the mechanism for the differential seasonal decline may not be food related, since prey abundance would be expected to impact brood sizes rather than to induce complete nest failures. Alternatively, we know from other studies that one of the main causes of nest failure in this black sparrowhawks is nest usurpation by Egyptian geese (Alopochen aegyptiaca, Curtis et al, 2007) and that this increases later in the breeding season (Sumasgutner et al, 2016a). Thus it may be that usurpation in more prevalent in more urbanized areas, since both species have recently expanded their South African range into the urban and suburban habitats of Cape Town (see Mangnall and Crowe, 2002 on Egyptian geese).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the mechanism for the differential seasonal decline may not be food related, since prey abundance would be expected to impact brood sizes rather than to induce complete nest failures. Alternatively, we know from other studies that one of the main causes of nest failure in this black sparrowhawks is nest usurpation by Egyptian geese (Alopochen aegyptiaca, Curtis et al, 2007) and that this increases later in the breeding season (Sumasgutner et al, 2016a). Thus it may be that usurpation in more prevalent in more urbanized areas, since both species have recently expanded their South African range into the urban and suburban habitats of Cape Town (see Mangnall and Crowe, 2002 on Egyptian geese).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Thus it may be that usurpation in more prevalent in more urbanized areas, since both species have recently expanded their South African range into the urban and suburban habitats of Cape Town (see Mangnall and Crowe, 2002 on Egyptian geese). This might further explain the significantly lower breeding success in more urbanized habitats later in the season, since the breeding season of Egyptian geese peaks later in the year (MacLean, 1997;Carboneras and Kirwan, 2016); when also the threat of nest usurpation increases (Sumasgutner et al, 2016a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another intriguing explanation documented for a species of bird ( Accipiter melanoleucus ) is that multiple‐nest building is a passive strategy to deal with nest usurpation by other aggressive species (Sumasgutner et al . ). Tent‐making bats may have to deal with roost usurpation by other species of bats that roost in tents but do not build them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Reducing flea infestations has been proposed as an explanation for constant roost-nest relocation in a species of bird (Cinnycerthia olivascens; Kattan et al 2013). Another intriguing explanation documented for a species of bird (Accipiter melanoleucus) is that multiple-nest building is a passive strategy to deal with nest usurpation by other aggressive species (Sumasgutner et al 2016). Tent-making bats may have to deal with roost usurpation by other species of bats that roost in tents but do not build them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…several data for each replication (individuals, sites, etc. ), by the use of one or several random grouping factor(s) (Bates, 2005;Cook et al, 2013;Hurlbert, 1984;Millar and Anderson, 2004;Sumasgutner et al, 2016;Zuur et al, 2009). Site (nested within habitat) and individual (nested within site) were included as random grouping factorsto control for pseudo-replication (Bates, 2005;Hurlbert, 1984;Zuur et al, 2009).…”
Section: Secondary Dispersal -mentioning
confidence: 99%