2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:argu.0000046715.74696.82
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Modernism Really Modern? Uncovering a Fallacy in Postmodernism

Abstract: Some postmodernists criticize the view that the logics of Western thought can be employed universally. In doing so, they assume without adequate proof that different human societies have greatly different rationalities and employ completely different logics. This essay argues that, on the contrary, widely different cultures often share noteworthy similarities in rationality.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[18][19]. These recommendations ought to resonate with researchers from any research tradition and, indeed, as Harpine [30] suggests, "Syllogism, deductive logic, inductive logic, the argument from authority, empirical observation, and hypothesis testing are widespread in diverse human societies" [p. 355], so these research methods are not necessarily even owned by Western scientists and empirical researchers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18][19]. These recommendations ought to resonate with researchers from any research tradition and, indeed, as Harpine [30] suggests, "Syllogism, deductive logic, inductive logic, the argument from authority, empirical observation, and hypothesis testing are widespread in diverse human societies" [p. 355], so these research methods are not necessarily even owned by Western scientists and empirical researchers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%