2021
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2021.634651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Metagenomic Analysis an Effective Way to Analyze Fish Feeding Habits? A Case of the Yellowfin Sea Bream Acanthopagrus latus (Houttuyn) in Daya Bay

Abstract: Yellowfin seabream, Acanthopagrus latus, is one of the most important species in terms of stock enhancement in China. However, using metagenomic techniques to explore the feeding habits and stomach microbiome of yellowfin seabream is still rare. The objective of this work was to study the feeding habits and stomach microbiome of yellowfin sea bream from Daya Bay through metagenomic analysis of different weight classes (≤50, 50–100, and >100 g). Whole-metagenome shotgun sequencing and morphological obser… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(104 reference statements)
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DNA metabarcoding method provided a clear taxonomic resolution of the partially digested stomach content and potentially detected highly diverse food taxa. This high taxonomic resolution is in line with those of previous dietary studies based on DNA-based approaches (e.g., Harms-Tuohy et al 2016;Pan et al 2021;Rees et al 2020;Sakaguchi et al 2017). The results of this study indicate that the diet ofCampylomormyrus and Gnathonemus species is composed mainly of three types of prey items, i.e., benthic invertebrates, allochthonous invertebrates, and macrophyte material.…”
Section: Diet Profilesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The DNA metabarcoding method provided a clear taxonomic resolution of the partially digested stomach content and potentially detected highly diverse food taxa. This high taxonomic resolution is in line with those of previous dietary studies based on DNA-based approaches (e.g., Harms-Tuohy et al 2016;Pan et al 2021;Rees et al 2020;Sakaguchi et al 2017). The results of this study indicate that the diet ofCampylomormyrus and Gnathonemus species is composed mainly of three types of prey items, i.e., benthic invertebrates, allochthonous invertebrates, and macrophyte material.…”
Section: Diet Profilesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This high taxonomic resolution is in line with those of previous dietary studies also based on DNA-based approaches (e.g. Harms-Tuohy et al, 2016;Pan et al, 2021;Rees et al, 2020;Sakaguchi et al, 2017) here cannot tell the stage of the aquatic insects found in the diet, it is reasonable to assume that the aquatic larvae, rather than the terrestrial imagines, were targeted by Campylomormyrus and Gnathonemus. Indeed, larvae of aquatic insects were reported as food items found in the stomach of mormyrid fish (Blake, 1977;Hyslop, 1986).…”
Section: Diet Profilesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Most of the current literature on teleost microbiomes was obtained through 16S rRNA barcoding (Llewellyn et al, 2014). In this study, we used whole metagenome sequencing (WMS) that has revealed an effective method for analysing both the feeding habits and gut microbiomes of fish (Pan et al, 2021). In addition to taxa information down to species and even strain levels that are not restricted to procaryotes, the use of WMS can allow analysis of functional potentials of microbiomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%