2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12272-021-01344-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is loss of smell an early predictor of COVID-19 severity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: monitored more closely in the early stages of COVID-19, for early diagnosis of severity of illness. An understanding of how the severity of COVID-19 infection and LOS are associated has profound implications for the clinical management and mitigation strategies for the disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
2
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of the study may be counterintuitive to many since increased viral load would be expected to lead to more widespread damage to the olfactory and gustatory epithelium. Nevertheless, the observations coincide with the findings of a meta‐analysis 2 in which severely ill patients with COVID‐19 had a lower odd of experiencing OD than non‐severely ill patients with COVID‐19 (odds ratio=0.527; 95% confidence interval 0.373–0.744); the viral loads have been associated directly with disease severity in patients with COVID‐19, and therefore, patients with OD and/or GD who had a low viral load (as reported in the study 1 ) would be expected to experience milder illness. 3 …”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…The findings of the study may be counterintuitive to many since increased viral load would be expected to lead to more widespread damage to the olfactory and gustatory epithelium. Nevertheless, the observations coincide with the findings of a meta‐analysis 2 in which severely ill patients with COVID‐19 had a lower odd of experiencing OD than non‐severely ill patients with COVID‐19 (odds ratio=0.527; 95% confidence interval 0.373–0.744); the viral loads have been associated directly with disease severity in patients with COVID‐19, and therefore, patients with OD and/or GD who had a low viral load (as reported in the study 1 ) would be expected to experience milder illness. 3 …”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…82,83 Multiple studies and reviews agree that disease severity is negatively associated with anosmia prevalence. 1,[83][84][85] Finally, objective methodology to assess olfactory dysfunction may be more sensitive than subjective recall, resulting in an increased prevalence, although studies are controversial. 7 Response bias may occur if early studies did not inquire about olfactory dysfunction as much as later studies.…”
Section: Effects Of Response Bias Age Disease Severity Gender and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean age of the patients seen in the clinic was 54.3 years, standard deviation 16.2. The median age of the respiratory clinic patients was 55 years; although olfactory dysfunction normally increases with age, in COVID-19 patients increasing age is correlated with lower prevalence of olfactory dysfunction (2), and lack of anosmia is associated with higher risk of severe illness and death in hospitalized patients(3, 14, 15). Uninfected patients in the current sample of patients over the age of 40 had 1.65 higher than expected incidence of anosmia; SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with anosmia incidence ∼3.9 times higher than expected from the NHANES study (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk of anosmia was 2.40 times greater if a patient displayed SARS-CoV-2 positivity (p= 0.0016, two tailed; Table 1). (2), and lack of anosmia is associated with higher risk of severe illness and death in hospitalized patients (3,14,15).…”
Section: (Which Was Not Certified By Peer Review)mentioning
confidence: 99%