2016
DOI: 10.1177/0261018316641259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is long-term care insurance in South Korea a socialising care policy?

Abstract: This article begins by posing the question of whether Long-Term Care (LTC) Insurance in South Korea is a socialising care policy. The socialisation of care is an application of the ethics of care as a normative principle governing the public domain. Its key characteristics include challenging the feminisation of care, re-evaluating the value of care, and encouraging the social recognition of care. However, LTC Insurance has reinforced the feminisation of care by treating care as a means for job creation, has w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notwithstanding these limitations, many indications suggest that generalization is likely. Mortality rates in LTCFs tended to represent a large portion of all deaths in Israel as in many countries around the globe [1,[18][19][20]. Visitation restrictions were instituted in many countries and were considered as negatively affecting residents' well-being [5,6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding these limitations, many indications suggest that generalization is likely. Mortality rates in LTCFs tended to represent a large portion of all deaths in Israel as in many countries around the globe [1,[18][19][20]. Visitation restrictions were instituted in many countries and were considered as negatively affecting residents' well-being [5,6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have examined the quality of newly created jobs for women, asking whether the working conditions of informal eldercare workers ( ganbyeongin ) are significantly different from their institutionalized yoyangbohosa counterparts (Oh and Roh, 2010). They also question whether the LTCI has truly socialized care when the policy fails to recognize the ongoing role of unpaid care (Kim, 2016). Notwithstanding these important findings and timely critiques, this line of inquiry neglects the role and contribution of migrant workers in the sector, a striking omission given the sector’s heavy reliance on migrant workers.…”
Section: Understanding Care Policy Through Workers’ Eyesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Welfare provision for older people has improved gradually since 2008, particularly after reforms in 2010 and 2015, which have focused mainly on elder abuse and home care services. The introduction of Long-Term Care (LTC) Insurance in 2008 is particularly notable as it acknowledges care as both a societal and a familial responsibility (Kim, 2016). Although policies for eldercare have improved, they still fail to address the problem of sufficient support for older people and those (usually women) who care for them.…”
Section: Have Recent Policies Supported Working Mothers? Child and Elmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although policies for eldercare have improved, they still fail to address the problem of sufficient support for older people and those (usually women) who care for them. The socialisation of care has not been achieved through the adoption of LTC Insurance, as it derived not from the need to attain socialisation of care but from urgent social and economic pressures, such as low fertility rates, unemployment and a lack of care services (Kim, 2016). The Confucian virtue of ‘filial piety’ is still accentuated in welfare provision for the elderly (Sung, 2014).…”
Section: Have Recent Policies Supported Working Mothers? Child and Elmentioning
confidence: 99%