2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.12.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is local biodiversity declining or not? A summary of the debate over analysis of species richness time trends

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
191
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
5
191
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is now recognised that large-scale biological changes are not always observed locally (Batt, Morley, Selden, Tingley, & Pinsky, 2017;Cardinale et al, 2018); results such as the present, showing increases in species richness and abundance, may seem counterintuitive given that a worldwide decline in biodiversity is unequivocal (Butchart et al, 2010;Scheffers et al, 2016). However, apparent increases in biodiversity may actually be only transient and probably mask profound underlying changes in species identity and community structure and composition.…”
Section: Change In Species Composition and Poleward Shift Of Fish Cmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…It is now recognised that large-scale biological changes are not always observed locally (Batt, Morley, Selden, Tingley, & Pinsky, 2017;Cardinale et al, 2018); results such as the present, showing increases in species richness and abundance, may seem counterintuitive given that a worldwide decline in biodiversity is unequivocal (Butchart et al, 2010;Scheffers et al, 2016). However, apparent increases in biodiversity may actually be only transient and probably mask profound underlying changes in species identity and community structure and composition.…”
Section: Change In Species Composition and Poleward Shift Of Fish Cmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Gonzalez et al () argued that the risk of biased estimates of change needs to be considered in short time series of species richness. Similarly, Cardinale, Gonzalez, Allington, and Loreau () drew attention to risks of using estimates of the earliest time point as baseline, pointing to the possibility of mistaking regressions to the mean for actual responses. Additionally, nonlinear data transformations can in particular affect the impression time series give us, as the distance between data points will change more in some intervals due to the transformation than in others.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gonzalez et al (2016) argued that the risk of biased estimates of change needs to be considered in short time series of species richness. Similarly, Cardinale, Gonzalez, Allington, and Loreau (2018) drew attention to risks of using estimates of the earliest time point as baseline, pointing to the possibility of mistaking regressions to the mean for actual responses.…”
Section: Materials and Me Thodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key task of ecology is to quantify and predict changes in community abundance and richness in response to anthropogenic increases in temperatures, species invasions, eutrophication, and habitat destruction (Vitousek 1994). However, given the challenges in interpreting meta-analyses after the fact (Gonzalez et al 2016), there remains a need for hypothesis-driven, standardized data on community trajectories (Cardinale et al 2018) especially for invertebrates (McGill et al 2015). However, given the challenges in interpreting meta-analyses after the fact (Gonzalez et al 2016), there remains a need for hypothesis-driven, standardized data on community trajectories (Cardinale et al 2018) especially for invertebrates (McGill et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%