2021
DOI: 10.1002/jso.26573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is liver transplantation a viable option for the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 48 ] Moreover, the high rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (61.4% of LT patients) and neoadjuvant radiation (42.1% of LT patients) has raised some skepticism, especially given that iCCA does not represent an accepted LT indication in the USA and hence receiving such treatments would be unlikely, given that most would presumably only be identified incidentally on the liver explant. [ 49 ] Though smaller case series have evaluated outcomes of LT in iCCA patients who received previous neoadjuvant therapy, these numbers are significantly lower than those presented. [ 22,48,50 ] This may be related to issues inherent to large registries, such as misclassification.…”
Section: Lr Versus Ltmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 48 ] Moreover, the high rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (61.4% of LT patients) and neoadjuvant radiation (42.1% of LT patients) has raised some skepticism, especially given that iCCA does not represent an accepted LT indication in the USA and hence receiving such treatments would be unlikely, given that most would presumably only be identified incidentally on the liver explant. [ 49 ] Though smaller case series have evaluated outcomes of LT in iCCA patients who received previous neoadjuvant therapy, these numbers are significantly lower than those presented. [ 22,48,50 ] This may be related to issues inherent to large registries, such as misclassification.…”
Section: Lr Versus Ltmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as further evidence accumulates either in support of LT in iCCA or for settings where LT should not be considered for iCCA, revision of the NLRB guidance document to include such guidance may be needed. [ 49 ] The use of living donor liver transplant (LDLT) is another option that would secure a graft for the patients enrolled in the trials, though not all patients have a suitable living donor, and not all centers offer LDLT. Certain countries such as Norway, with a less pronounced organ scarcity, may be instrumental in further accelerating trial results and exploring the limits of patient selection, as has been observed with the previous SECA trials with LT for patients with colorectal liver metastases.…”
Section: Mmajccc Prospective Case Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 5-year OS rate in patients with ICC after LT was 52.8%, which was significantly higher than that in patients with ICC following LR (HR = 0.62, p = 0.009). The results of our study are encouraging because it is generally accepted in the transplant community that a 5-year OS rate of at least 50–60% is required for a transplant indication to be considered acceptable 20 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%