2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is litter decomposition influenced by forest size and invertebrate detritivores during the dry season in semiarid Chaco Serrano?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, during the dry season in Caatinga, plants lose their leaves as an adaptive mechanism to water stress to which they are submitted, hence the great contribution of leaf litter produced. Bernaschini et al (2016) in their study, questioned the fact that the litter decomposition had an influence on the size of the forest and the decomposition of invertebrates in the semiarid region of Argentina. Finally, they concluded that the first studies of the decomposition in these areas in the dry period did not succeed, that is, the size of the fragment did not affect the decomposition.…”
Section: Fimentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thus, during the dry season in Caatinga, plants lose their leaves as an adaptive mechanism to water stress to which they are submitted, hence the great contribution of leaf litter produced. Bernaschini et al (2016) in their study, questioned the fact that the litter decomposition had an influence on the size of the forest and the decomposition of invertebrates in the semiarid region of Argentina. Finally, they concluded that the first studies of the decomposition in these areas in the dry period did not succeed, that is, the size of the fragment did not affect the decomposition.…”
Section: Fimentioning
confidence: 96%
“…2019 DOI: doi.org/10.18671/scifor.v47n124.08 A maior taxa de decomposição no período de fevereiro a abril coincidiu com as menores quantidades de chuva na região. O mesmo foi visto por Bernaschini et al (2015) que descobriram um papel importante da fauna do solo durante a estação seca, quando se poderia esperar uma decomposição mais lenta devido ao fato das condições serem particularmente limitantes para este processo. Outra justificativa é que o acúmulo desses materiais no solo conserva a água e diminuem as variações de temperatura, favorecendo as atividades dos micro e macro-organismos na região, independente da época do ano, como avaliado por Machado (2011).…”
Section: Taxa De Decomposiçãounclassified
“…Since decomposer diversity usually decreases with the loss of available micro‐habitats like deadwood diversity and amount (Rantalainen et al 2005, Müller and Bütler 2010, Grilli et al 2017, Seibold et al 2017), decomposition may be slower in smaller (Moreno et al 2014) and more isolated habitats (Spiesman et al 2018). Yet some studies have reported either null (Bernaschini et al 2016) or positive (Schleuning et al 2011, Hertzog et al 2019) effects of habitat loss and isolation on the decomposition rates in terrestrial systems, suggesting a context–dependent relationship of habitat fragmentation and decomposition. Since decomposition studies are typically conducted in complex terrestrial habitats, the delineation of ‘island' from matrix and an understanding of the ecological responses to habitat loss and fragmentation may be hard to achieve due to the matrix‐type effects (Fahrig 2017, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%