2014
DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2014.904060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is ‘Learning' Science Enough? – A Cultural Model of Religious Students of Science in an Australian Government School

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Pittinsky () advocates showing less disdain and more respect and for those who do not acknowledge established scientific theories; they are not “stupid” because they cannot see evolution or climate change with their own eyes and do not feel obliged to take someone else's word for it. In short, “the most fruitful pedagogical path for evolution education is one filled with respect” (Colburn and Henriques, ; Long, : 135; Ferguson and Kameniar, ), and science should not be taught in a way that religious students feel they have to denounce it to defend their religion (Ferguson and Kameniar, ). If we force the choice between a student's soul and science when attempting to teach about evolution, we are doomed to failure (Glaze and Goldston, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Pittinsky () advocates showing less disdain and more respect and for those who do not acknowledge established scientific theories; they are not “stupid” because they cannot see evolution or climate change with their own eyes and do not feel obliged to take someone else's word for it. In short, “the most fruitful pedagogical path for evolution education is one filled with respect” (Colburn and Henriques, ; Long, : 135; Ferguson and Kameniar, ), and science should not be taught in a way that religious students feel they have to denounce it to defend their religion (Ferguson and Kameniar, ). If we force the choice between a student's soul and science when attempting to teach about evolution, we are doomed to failure (Glaze and Goldston, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hermann () referred to a process called “cognitive apartheid” (Coburn, ), in which students can simply wall off that which is believed from that which is not believed, for two high school students who demonstrated a sophisticated understanding of evolution despite their insistence that they did not believe in evolution; other studies have proposed a similar phenomenon (McKeachie et al, ; Ingram and Nelson, ). In their study of four religious high school students studying evolutionary biology, Ferguson and Kameniar () describe believing and learning schemas as ways the students classified religious explanations and evolutionary biology, with the latter being made subordinate to the former, as the mechanism by which these students were able to maintain their existential foundation while fulfilling their school commitments. All of these students perceived evolutionary biology to be in direct conflict with their religions explanation of origins and their learning schema was basically the acquisition of knowledge in order to succeed on tests rather than engaging in what the authors (and undoubtedly others) would call “meaningful” learning in which true knowledge about and understanding of the natural world is sought.…”
Section: Obstacles To Teaching and Learning Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, an important consideration is that highly committed religious clients use religious constructs in thinking and decision making (Ferguson & Kameniar, 2014;Worthington, 1988). Thus, counselors are presented with unique challenges when faith is a prominent clinical variable.…”
Section: Faith As a Cultural Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, when these actors are necessarily placed within social learning environment, these intrinsic understandings are likely to influence their teaching and learning practices and how they interact with school students. This is because science teachers and students have their own customs, principles, belief systems, desires and expectations (Aikenhead 1996) which may need to be rearranged and re-interpreted when dealing with conflicting 'believing schemas' (Ferguson and Kameniar 2014).…”
Section: Science and Worldviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%