2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2006.00431.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is lack of mating competitiveness in spring linked to mating asynchrony between wild and mass‐reared codling moths from an operational sterile insect programme?

Abstract: Mating competitiveness and pheromone trap catches of mass-reared, male codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), from the Osoyoos, British Columbia, Canada, massrearing facility operated by the Okanagan-Kootenay Sterile Insect Release Board, were compared to wild males using mark-release-recapture field experiments in spring, summer, and autumn at Summerland, British Columbia. In spring, significantly more wild diapause males mated with tethered, wild females than did non-irradiated (0 Gy)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
46
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
46
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, relative competitiveness, c S , was estimated as the mean number of matings observed by irradiated males relative to that for releases of control males. Although a similar experiment also recorded copulations with wild males ( Judd et al , 2006 ), these data could not be used to derive estimates for the competitiveness of irradiated males relative to wild ones because the absolute density of wild moths was unknown. Data from pheromone trap catches could not be used to estimate wild moths relative to the number of irradiated males released because these trap results would have been affected by some of the same competitiveness factors affecting the copulation results.…”
Section: Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Here, relative competitiveness, c S , was estimated as the mean number of matings observed by irradiated males relative to that for releases of control males. Although a similar experiment also recorded copulations with wild males ( Judd et al , 2006 ), these data could not be used to derive estimates for the competitiveness of irradiated males relative to wild ones because the absolute density of wild moths was unknown. Data from pheromone trap catches could not be used to estimate wild moths relative to the number of irradiated males released because these trap results would have been affected by some of the same competitiveness factors affecting the copulation results.…”
Section: Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, there was no difference in the time of participation between wild flies from Maui and Kona and sterile flies (Lance et al, 2000). Similarly, sterile codling moth males initiate flight and mate finding approximately 45 min earlier than wild moths, which results in lower mating success (Judd et al, 2006). Similarly, sterile codling moth males initiate flight and mate finding approximately 45 min earlier than wild moths, which results in lower mating success (Judd et al, 2006).…”
Section: Precopulatory Mating Failurementioning
confidence: 89%
“…As mating competitiveness, and presumably female choosiness, can decrease with increasing laboratory generations (Iwahashi et al, 1983), additional studies on male irradition using F1 wild individuals are needed. In a field study of the codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.), wild females were less likely to mate with mass-reared males, regardless of whether they had been irradiated or not, compared to wild males (Judd et al, 2006). In another study with this same species in a laboratory walkin cage, wild females were more likely to mate with wild males than with mass-reared males irradiated at either 3 or 8 krad.…”
Section: Precopulatory Mating Failurementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The response of male mass-reared moths to pheromone stimuli in spring may differ significantly from that of wild moths. Sterile male moths appear to initiate flight and matefinding at a different time of day than wild moths and their success in mating is greatly reduced (Judd et al, 2006). This is perhaps caused by a difference in the moths' response to environmental stimuli.…”
Section: Experimental Program and Questionsmentioning
confidence: 96%