This study examines the effects of corporate governance and diversification strategy on organizational employment stability. Calls for reform in the governance of public corporations have led to the adoption of practices that render senior executives more accountable to shareholders. However, the extant corporate governance literature suggests that mechanisms which make managers more accountable to shareholders might introduce a short-term bias to top managers' decision-making. Arguing that employment stability reflects a long-term decision-making orientation, results of this study show that firms with boards comprised of a greater proportion of independent, or "outside," directors have lower levels of aggregate employment stability. In contrast, findings indicate that more diversified firms tend to have higher levels of aggregate employment stability. suggests that historically, successful organizations are characterized by relatively high levels of employment security. When workforces are relatively free from the fear of sudden termination, higher organizational performance, including financial performance, is thought to result from greater innovation, flexibility, trust, communication, cooperation, and organizational commitment on the part of employees. Rather than employment security however, contemporary organizations seem to have a greater proclivity for actions such as "downsizing," or the planned reduction in