Is it true that negative emotions cause more utilitarian judgements? from the influence of emotion and cognition

Yang, Haibo; Tang, Chunmei; Wang, Donglin

doi:10.1080/02699931.2023.2258572

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, people compare their attitudes to those of others and might even adjust them based on their perceived similarities (Adolphs, 2003;Heider, 1958;Hovland et al, 1957) or the number of agents that are involved (Bower, 1961). Further, the setting in which interactions between two agents occur and how they manifest can affect our judgment of those individuals (Wang et al, 2023;Yang et al, 2023).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Naturalistic Generative Narratives Reveal Effects of Social Characteristics on Decision-Making

Wong,

Williams,

Williams

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The social characteristics of others can powerfully influence our decisions. They can also be broadly impacted by the social context in which these choices are made, making the effects of these characteristics on decision-making especially challenging to understand. Here, we developed a Generative Narrative Approach that provided participants with naturalistic scenarios that richly varied in social context and theme but that also systematically varied the characteristics of the social agents involved. After validating this approach using feeling thermometer measures, we find that the emotional states of others had the strongest and most consistent effect on the participants’ choices. More notably, whereas most characteristics had independent effects on decision-making, social features such as the inferred socioeconomic status of others significantly influenced the effect that race had on the participant’s judgments. Moreover, the social context of the agent’s interactions with other agents had a significant additive effect, especially when the emotional states of the agents in the scenarios contrasted. The influence of these characteristics on the participants’ choices was also markedly affected by their demographics, especially when contrasting with that of the agents involved, and were often driven by the participants' reported political views. Together, these findings reveal how the mixture of social characteristics, context, and personal views influence decision-making and highlight the use of naturalistic generative narrative approaches in studying human behavior.

show abstract