2000
DOI: 10.1080/713677090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is it Possible to be a Feminist Manager in the ‘Real World’ of Further Education?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise Kerfoot and Whitehead (2000) regard FE and managerialism to be essentially sites of competitive masculine discourse. Hughes (2000) differentiates between female managers and feminist managers. Conservative or liberal women managers parallel their male counterparts whereas feminist managers were more concerned with 'the ethics of care [and] social revolution', so to be a true feminist manager was not feasible given the then prevailing FE climate (Hughes 2000, 253).…”
Section: Research In Post-compulsory Education 399mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Likewise Kerfoot and Whitehead (2000) regard FE and managerialism to be essentially sites of competitive masculine discourse. Hughes (2000) differentiates between female managers and feminist managers. Conservative or liberal women managers parallel their male counterparts whereas feminist managers were more concerned with 'the ethics of care [and] social revolution', so to be a true feminist manager was not feasible given the then prevailing FE climate (Hughes 2000, 253).…”
Section: Research In Post-compulsory Education 399mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Accounts of feminist management in higher and further education suggest that it is characterized by a commitment to social equity and social change and a guiding awareness of gender issues and intersections with other social divisions (Bickham et al ., 2001). It involves an explicit attempt to challenge the unequal distribution and exercise of power, hierarchical structures and decision‐making processes and hegemonic and discriminatory institutional practices (Hughes, 2000; Kelly et al ., 1994; Strachan, 1999; Wyn et al ., 2000). Feminist management is equated, for some, with flattened organizational structures (e.g., Bickham et al ., 2001) and for many, with consultative, egalitarian, participatory and collaborative ways of working (Deem and Ozga, 2000; Wyn et al ., 2000) and producing scholarly knowledge (Mountz et al ., 2003; Ramazanoglu, 1990; Tanton and Hughes, 1999).…”
Section: The Concept and Practice Of Feminist Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feminist management is equated, for some, with flattened organizational structures (e.g., Bickham et al ., 2001) and for many, with consultative, egalitarian, participatory and collaborative ways of working (Deem and Ozga, 2000; Wyn et al ., 2000) and producing scholarly knowledge (Mountz et al ., 2003; Ramazanoglu, 1990; Tanton and Hughes, 1999). Feminist managers tend to emphasize interdependence and the benefits and rewards of collaboration and mutuality over competition and individualism (Hughes, 2000).…”
Section: The Concept and Practice Of Feminist Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Deem et al (2000) would in part attribute this process to the emerging feminization of management within the sector as well as with the departure of the first wave of post-incorporation management (see also Cole 2000, Hughes 2000. Gleeson and Shain (1999), from a rather different position, would point to emerging co-operative and collaborative relations developing within the sector holding the excesses of marketization in check.…”
Section: Managerialism -New Relations?mentioning
confidence: 99%