Is It Personal? Gendered Mediation in Newspaper Coverage of Canadian National Party Leadership Contests, 1975–2012

Abstract

Our study examines the phenomenon of personalization in news coverage of candidates for the leadership of Canadian national political parties. Because the politicization of the personal through newspaper coverage of bodies and intimate lives has different meanings for women and men politicians, we argue that it is important to account for gender differences in levels of personalization. Our analysis of the Globe and Mail newspaper reporting of thirteen party leadership races held between 1975 and 2012 includes eleven competitive women candidates, four of whom won the leadership contest. Conducting a content analysis of 2,463 newspaper articles published over the course of this thirty-seven-year period facilitates comparison of the levels of personalized coverage over time, by leadership contest, and by candidate gender and success. Findings reveal that the amount of personal coverage did not increase over time, as the personalization literature hypothesizes. However, reporting was significantly more likely to "make it personal" for women candidates, as suggested by the literature on media coverage of women politicians. We argue that gendered mediation is largely driving the personalization of political reporting in the Canadian national context

‘No smiling, please, Ms Prime Minister!’: Constructing a female politician on the cover of a news magazine

“…For example, Linda Trimble et al (2013) have noted that news coverage of female politicians is much more intimate than that of their male colleagues. Nahuel Ribke (2014) has studied how celebrities, in his case former fashion models, have entered the political field in Israel.…”

“…In contemporary western societies, political journalism has turned its attention to political personalities instead of traditional political questions (van Zoonen 2005: 69;Trimble et al 2013), and tends to mix the political and popular contents (Ribke 2014;Dahlgren 2006;Street 2004;Corner 2000) in the hope of attracting readers. This means that political leaders have to be ready to stage their personas.…”

“The Yokel from Teleorman”: Representations of Romanian Prime Minister in Satirical News Websites

“…Despite the improvements in the last decades, in the case of women politicians, news media are often one of the major factors working against them, as their depiction is biased both from a quantitative and qualitative point of view. As demonstrated in different studies related to long-established democracies, women pol- iticians are given less visibility than their male counterparts and are less quoted as sources (Ross and Comrie, 2012); reporting about them is significantly more likely to "make it personal" (Trimble et al, 2013) and trivial. At the same time, generally, their portrayals are sexualized and gender-stereotyped (Garcia-Blanco and Wahl-Jorgensen, 2012; Absolu, 2014; Cameron and Shaw, 2016, etc.).…”

Behold... the Head of State’s Spouse! A comparative study of the political rise of the First Lady in Poland, France and Spain

“…As to the coverage itself, the frame on women in gendered roles of sex symbols or mothers, the emphasis on private life and the use of explicit body markers, rather than a focus on their public statements engenders a de-legitimisation of women as political leaders (Trimble et al, 2013). Subsequently, the distorted media representation of female politicians helps in maintaining the gender gap on the political stage and negatively influences further possibilities of greater female empowerment in public life.…”

“…Putting the candidate in the spotlight automatically leads to public interest in their private life (Mazzoni and Ciaglia, 2013), especially since the irruption of the Internet and informational overload. It caused increasing professionalisation of politicians in the management of the media (Cristante, 2011) and a boost of media and political populism caused by an excessive interest in private life and in emotions (Blumler and Kavanagh, 1999) and the "politicisation of private persona" (Trimble et al, 2013).…”