2020
DOI: 10.1177/0003702820930733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is It or Isn't It: The Importance of Visual Classification in Microplastic Characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
89
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
89
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Photographs of all potential microplastics were recorded, size (mm) and surface area (mm 2 ) were measured using Image software, and their morphology (fibres or fragments) was described. Visual identification followed 63 where fibres are distinguished from fragments based on the length to width composition. All selected particles from each sample were subjected to further chemical characterisation using µFT-IR analysis on PerkinElmer Spotlight 400 FTIR (transmission micro-FTIR with DCC).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Photographs of all potential microplastics were recorded, size (mm) and surface area (mm 2 ) were measured using Image software, and their morphology (fibres or fragments) was described. Visual identification followed 63 where fibres are distinguished from fragments based on the length to width composition. All selected particles from each sample were subjected to further chemical characterisation using µFT-IR analysis on PerkinElmer Spotlight 400 FTIR (transmission micro-FTIR with DCC).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All selected particles from each sample were subjected to further chemical characterisation using µFT-IR analysis on PerkinElmer Spotlight 400 FTIR (transmission micro-FTIR with DCC). The spectra were processed the same way as for the surface samples, details are given in 63 . The weight of subsurface microplastics was estimated on the base of the polymer density and volume of every particle, with an assumption that all the fibres are cylinders with visible diameter, and the fragments thickness was roughly estimated by comparison with the sizes of the fibres nearby.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual classification is typically the initial step in distinguishing microplastic particles from non-synthetic microparticles. 76 Physical manipulation of the sample with tweezers and an optical microscope is one of the most common plastic classification steps, but this technique has produced considerable barriers to sample throughput that automated image classification may be able to solve. Visual classification cannot describe polymer types but gives an indication as to whether a particle is a plastic or not.…”
Section: Image Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using multiple techniques and settings (e.g., lighting and background magnification) and incorporating several lines of evidence will aid in the accuracy of visual microplastic classification. 14,76,79 Reference Libraries. Reference libraries allow quick retrieval of microplastic shapes, surface topologies, colors, and fluorescence to validate a visual classification of microplastics.…”
Section: Image Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two tertiary-treatment WWTPs in Wuhan, which represent advanced treatment following two preceding treatments for high-quality water effluent, had microfibre removal rates as low as 66.1% and 62.7% and 43.75% was reported for a tertiary WWTP in Nanjing (Chen et al, 2020). In 2017, 2209 WWTPs treated a total of 45.29 billion m 3 of sewage in Chinese urban areas (Liu and Xu, 2019). Those WWTPs undertake both domestic sewage and industrial wastewater and have great potential to discharge into the environment.…”
Section: Wastewater Treatment Plants (Wwtps)mentioning
confidence: 99%