2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2022.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is it necessary to remove bone-impacted teeth? A retrospective study

et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…About 27-68.6% of these eruptive problems are impactions [2], rising to 73% in the young adult European population [3]. This is why the surgical procedure of third molar removal is one of the most common in the daily practice of oral and maxillofacial surgeons, since the pathology derived from impacted third molars is extensive, affecting the patient in general and the oral cavity and adjacent teeth in particular [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 27-68.6% of these eruptive problems are impactions [2], rising to 73% in the young adult European population [3]. This is why the surgical procedure of third molar removal is one of the most common in the daily practice of oral and maxillofacial surgeons, since the pathology derived from impacted third molars is extensive, affecting the patient in general and the oral cavity and adjacent teeth in particular [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%