2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06288.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is it necessary to perform prophylactic cholecystectomy for asymptomatic subjects with gallbladder polyps and gallstones?

Abstract: There was no significant difference in delta polyp size between the examinees with gallbladder polyps and cholelithiasis and those with gallbladder polyps only. Hence, a small proportion of subjects with gallbladder polyps and cholelithiasis, such as those with thickened gallbladder walls and an interval increase in the size of the gallbladder polyps are candidates for prophylactic cholecytectomy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
14
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the findings of this study agree with those of previous reports, in particular the observation that initial size greater than 10 mm and subsequent growth on interval scanning predicts neoplas-tic or potentially neoplastic polyps. [22][23][24][25][26] In addition, the results are in accordance with other observations regarding the very low rate of true polyps and malignant polyps in patients with sonographic mucosal abnormalities consistent with possible polyps [22][23][24][25][26] ; further refinements have attempted to correlate the rate of growth with neoplastic potential. 27 The relatively small number of patients (n=134) who underwent surgery also requires consideration when interpreting the validity of the results.…”
Section: Caveatssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In general, the findings of this study agree with those of previous reports, in particular the observation that initial size greater than 10 mm and subsequent growth on interval scanning predicts neoplas-tic or potentially neoplastic polyps. [22][23][24][25][26] In addition, the results are in accordance with other observations regarding the very low rate of true polyps and malignant polyps in patients with sonographic mucosal abnormalities consistent with possible polyps [22][23][24][25][26] ; further refinements have attempted to correlate the rate of growth with neoplastic potential. 27 The relatively small number of patients (n=134) who underwent surgery also requires consideration when interpreting the validity of the results.…”
Section: Caveatssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…There was, therefore, no significant difference in delta polyp size between the examinees with gallbladder polyps and cholelithiasis and those with gallbladder polyps only. [11]…”
Section: Relation Between Gallbladder Stones and Gallbladder Polypsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El detectar pólipos en 73 o 74 personas de cada 100 casos atendidos, indica la importancia de seguir utilizando este método diagnóstico, pues la mayoría de las instituciones de salud cuenta con un equipo ecográfico, por la accesibilidad en cuanto a costos y por ser un procedimiento no invasivo. Además, la ecografía permite visualizar la pared vesicular y el seguimiento de los pólipos en cuanto al tamaño que son aspectos básicos para realizar colecistectomía profiláctica (30).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified