2015
DOI: 10.1080/17457289.2015.1008495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is It Gender, Ideology or Resources? Individual-Level Determinants of Preferential Voting for Male or Female Candidates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They could use the socio-demographic background of candidates as a heuristic cue to deduce the policy positions of a candidate (people belonging to the same group as I do will have similar views), or it could be a purposive strategy to increase the presence of these under-represented groups. Research on group-based voting behaviour have indeed shown that women are (slightly) more likely than men to vote for women (Erzeel & Caluwaerts, 2015;Marien et al, 2016;van Erkel, 2019) and that voters with a migration background are more likely to vote for candidates with that background (Jacobs, Kelbel & Pilet, 2013;Teney et al, 2010). Our overview also confirms that women and ethnic minority people are more inclined to cast a preference vote.…”
Section: Identity Modelsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They could use the socio-demographic background of candidates as a heuristic cue to deduce the policy positions of a candidate (people belonging to the same group as I do will have similar views), or it could be a purposive strategy to increase the presence of these under-represented groups. Research on group-based voting behaviour have indeed shown that women are (slightly) more likely than men to vote for women (Erzeel & Caluwaerts, 2015;Marien et al, 2016;van Erkel, 2019) and that voters with a migration background are more likely to vote for candidates with that background (Jacobs, Kelbel & Pilet, 2013;Teney et al, 2010). Our overview also confirms that women and ethnic minority people are more inclined to cast a preference vote.…”
Section: Identity Modelsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Preference votes are also highly relevant for several academic discussions as they touch upon a wide range of politically relevant phenomena such as the personalization of politics (Karvonen, 2010;Wauters, Thijssen, Van Aelst & Pilet, 2018), party decline (Cross, Katz & Pruysers, 2018), parliamentary behaviour (Bräuninger, Brunner & Däubler, 2012), political careers (André, Depauw, Shugart & Chytilek, 2017;Folke, Persson & Rickne, 2016), campaign behaviour van Erkel, Thijssen & Van Aelst, 2017) and the representation of social groups such as women and ethnic minorities (Erzeel & Caluwaerts, 2015;Holli & Wass, 2010;Marien, Schouteden & Wauters, 2016;Teney, Jacobs, Rea & Delwit, 2010). In the last few decades, research on this topic has expanded enormously in the Low Countries because of the range of multifaceted options embedded in their electoral systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that examine whether voter-candidate similarities also impact preferential voting are scarce. Only regarding gender do we find a handful of studies investigating whether women are more inclined to cast a preferential vote for a female candidate, but their findings are mixed at best (McElroy and Marsh, 2010;Erzeel and Caluwaerts, 2015;Marien et al, 2017;Erzeel et al, 2018). Teney et al (2010) also find evidence that candidates with an ethnic minority background are more likely to cast a vote for an ethnic minority candidate.…”
Section: The Influence Of Voter-candidate Similarities On Votingmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In this sense, casting a preferential vote can be seen as a symbolic action to support the own group. Second, citizens may vote for candidates resembling them because they expect these candidates to share similar experiences and ideas and, therefore, to be the best option to represent their interests (Erzeel and Caluwaerts, 2015), following a more instrumental logic. This idea can be traced back to scholars working on descriptive representation (Pitkin, 1967;Mansbridge, 1999).…”
Section: The Influence Of Voter-candidate Similarities On Votingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Political interest and knowledge also impact on voters' attitudes about the role of women in political life (Bittner et al 2010;Jennings 2006), which is also sometimes called 'gender ideology' (3) (Erzeel and Caluwaerts 2015;Shvedova 2005)o r 'gender role attitudes' (Brooks and Bolzendahl 2004). This concept refers to opinions of individual voters about the role of men and women in society (Bittner et al 2010;Brooks and Bolzendahl 2004).…”
Section: Explaining the Effects Of Compulsory Voting On Descriptive Rmentioning
confidence: 99%