Most research on prolonged grief has utilized retrospective self-report or interview-based measures. Although valuable, these methods have limitations: they are subject to recall error and bias and provide little information about the dynamics of prolonged grief symptoms as they unfold in daily life. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) has the potential to overcome these limitations by assessing grief- related symptoms repeatedly over the course of people’s day-to-day lives in their natural environment. However, there remains considerable uncertainty about how bereaved adults will respond to this type of assessment, especially among those with persistent, distressing grief. In the present study, we evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of an EMA protocol, including whether responding to EMA surveys pertaining to grief leads to worsening of grief symptoms (i.e., measurement reactivity) in a sample of bereaved adults with and without high severity of prolonged grief symptoms (indicated by a score of 30 or higher or a score of below 30 on the Inventory of Complicated Grief, respectively; Prigerson et al., 1995). Participants completed a 17-day data collection period in which they responded to six EMA surveys per day on their personal smartphones. Feasibility was determined by the proportion of EMA surveys completed and the portion of participants who withdrew from the study during the EMA period. Acceptability was assessed with a self-report questionnaire administered at the end of EMA data collection. Measurement reactivity was assessed by evaluating the trajectory of prolonged grief symptoms during the EMA period. The mean proportion of assessments completed was 90% (median = 96%). Only 6% of participants withdrew from the EMA portion of the study. Adherence was modestly lower in those with high prolonged grief symptom severity (mean = 86%; median = 96%) than in those without (mean= 93%, median=97%). On average, participants reported agreement that survey frequency and length was acceptable and disagreed with items querying whether the survey was burdensome or time consuming. Those with high prolonged grief severity reported higher average agreement that the EMA questions were personally relevant. No other group differences in acceptability were observed. There was no evidence for systematic worsening of symptoms during EMA data collection. These findings suggest that EMA is feasible, acceptable, and safe for bereaved adults, including those with high prolonged grief severity. Given these findings and the considerable advantages of this method, EMA should be used more widely to advance our understanding of prolonged grief.