2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is inertial flywheel resistance training superior to gravity-dependent resistance training in improving muscle strength? A systematic review with meta-analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
66
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies using inertia to apply eccentric overload via a flywheel (Norrbrand et al 2008) are difficult to compare with the present study, as it is challenging to quantifying the intensity applied with the flywheel compared with the present study. However, it should be noted that a recent meta-analysis concluded that flywheel resistance training was not superior to constant load strength training for increases in strength (Vicens-Bordas et al 2018), which is in line with the present results. In the present study, leg press was chosen because of its functional relevance and previously well-documented FGC improvements (Fimland et al 2009;Unhjem et al 2015), and particular care was taken to ensure a progressive increase in concentric intensity (~90% of 1RM) throughout the training period, by adding more resistance when the participants could lift more than the intended four repetitions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Other studies using inertia to apply eccentric overload via a flywheel (Norrbrand et al 2008) are difficult to compare with the present study, as it is challenging to quantifying the intensity applied with the flywheel compared with the present study. However, it should be noted that a recent meta-analysis concluded that flywheel resistance training was not superior to constant load strength training for increases in strength (Vicens-Bordas et al 2018), which is in line with the present results. In the present study, leg press was chosen because of its functional relevance and previously well-documented FGC improvements (Fimland et al 2009;Unhjem et al 2015), and particular care was taken to ensure a progressive increase in concentric intensity (~90% of 1RM) throughout the training period, by adding more resistance when the participants could lift more than the intended four repetitions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Contrastingly, in isotonic exercises the concentric phase is more demanding than the eccentric phase (3,32). The advantages of eccentric resistance exercise on subsequent performance have been reported by previous authors (18,32), e.g. EOL protocol reported a positive PAP effect on jump and sprint performance in soccer players (14); moreover, improved lower limb (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Iso-inertial devices, also known as flywheel ergometers, can be utilised to perform an eccentric overload (EOL) protocol. These have been largely utilised to produce chronic adaptations (32). Nevertheless, only a few studies have analysed the acute performance benefits offered by this protocol.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several meta-analyses have examined the effectiveness of FIT in improving muscle hypertrophy, strength, and power output [26][27][28][29]; however, very little practical information regarding the sets, repetitions, intensities, or frequencies that can be used to optimize training has been provided. Tesch et al [30] summarized the findings of a number of FIT studies and provided some practical guidelines for YoYo™ exercise training.…”
Section: Flywheel Inertial Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these studies have displayed positive increases in muscle size, the participants trained using isolated, single-joint movements (e.g., knee extension) or small muscle group exercises (e.g., shoulder abduction). As a result, the conclusions drawn within the meta-analyses may be biased, given that 77.8% [26,27], 70.0% [29], and 57.1% [28] of the studies included for muscle size were based on these movements. While these exercises may be beneficial for body building and rehabilitation settings, they are not commonly prescribed when training team sport athletes.…”
Section: Flywheel Inertial Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%