2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00226.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Hospital Admission and Observation Required after a Normal Abdominal Computed Tomography Scan in Children with Blunt Abdominal Trauma?

Abstract: Objectives: The objective was to determine if hospital admission of children with blunt abdominal trauma for observation of possible intraabdominal injury (IAI) is necessary after a normal abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan in the emergency department (ED). Methods:The authors conducted a prospective observational cohort study of children less than 18 years of age with blunt abdominal trauma who underwent an abdominal CT scan in the ED. Abdominal CT scans were obtained with intravenous contrast but no ora… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19 Consistent with prior studies, the parent study of the current analysis 18 revealed the prevalence rate of intra-abdominal injury undergoing acute intervention to be less than 2% of children with blunt torso trauma, while nearly half of the children presenting with blunt torso trauma underwent abdominal CT scaning. 15,[20][21][22] In both adult and pediatric trauma patients, CT use has rapidly increased in the ED for many conditions. Indiscriminate use of CT is not without risks as it leads to increased health care costs, increased risk of contrastinduced nephropathy, and most importantly, increased risk of radiation-induced malignancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Consistent with prior studies, the parent study of the current analysis 18 revealed the prevalence rate of intra-abdominal injury undergoing acute intervention to be less than 2% of children with blunt torso trauma, while nearly half of the children presenting with blunt torso trauma underwent abdominal CT scaning. 15,[20][21][22] In both adult and pediatric trauma patients, CT use has rapidly increased in the ED for many conditions. Indiscriminate use of CT is not without risks as it leads to increased health care costs, increased risk of contrastinduced nephropathy, and most importantly, increased risk of radiation-induced malignancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both hypothetical cases, almost all physicians surveyed were willing to discharge patients given normal abdominal CTs. While abdominal CT is not perfectly sensitive for IAI, particularly pancreatic injuries, such injuries are unlikely in patients with normal CTs, normal mental status, and non-tender abdominal examinations 3, 912. In a meta-analysis of nearly 2,600 pediatric blunt trauma patients, the prevalence of IAI after a normal abdominal CT was 0.19% and the negative predictive value of a normal abdominal CT was 99.8% 13…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spleen (111) Kidney (69) Others (6) Liver (6) Spleen (6) Kidney ( Others (22) Bowel and mesentery (6) Diaphragm (2) Gall bladder (1) Urinary bladder (1) Inferior vena cava (1) Liver (4) Kidney (3) Pancreas (1) Atrium (1) Liver ( have suggested that a blunt trauma patient could be discharged safely after a negative CT examination. [3,4] However, another study compared the results of CT and autopsy in 113 trauma patients and found that CT had a high rate of missed diagnoses of abdominal organ injuries. [5] In addition, CT has proven to be less useful in detecting hollow viscus injuries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%