2017
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2017.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is homoploid hybrid speciation that rare? An empiricist’s view

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
100
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
3
100
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The accurate identification of a homoploid hybrid species is experimentally challenging, often requiring a combination of morphological and molecular analyses (Mallet, ). In addition, there is a lack of agreement on the defining criteria of a homoploid hybrid species (Nieto Feliner et al., ; Schumer, Rosenthal, & Andolfatto, ; Schumer et al., ). Nevertheless, given that occasional hybridization between closely related species is frequent in plants (Mallet, ) and that homoploid hybrids are difficult to identify, opinion has recently shifted to speculate that HHS might play a more prominent role in plant evolution than previously thought (Mallet, ; Mavárez & Linares, ; Nolte & Tautz, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accurate identification of a homoploid hybrid species is experimentally challenging, often requiring a combination of morphological and molecular analyses (Mallet, ). In addition, there is a lack of agreement on the defining criteria of a homoploid hybrid species (Nieto Feliner et al., ; Schumer, Rosenthal, & Andolfatto, ; Schumer et al., ). Nevertheless, given that occasional hybridization between closely related species is frequent in plants (Mallet, ) and that homoploid hybrids are difficult to identify, opinion has recently shifted to speculate that HHS might play a more prominent role in plant evolution than previously thought (Mallet, ; Mavárez & Linares, ; Nolte & Tautz, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genome-wide sequence data have led to an increased appreciation of the prevalence of admixture and introgression between species (Payseur & Rieseberg, 2016;Pease et al, 2016;Wallbank et al, 2016). While the consequences of hybridization have historically been viewed as maladaptive (Fisher, 1930), others have proposed that hybridization can be a generative force that facilitates adaptive evolution and speciation (Hedrick, 2013;Mallet, 2007;Nieto Feliner et al, 2017;Seehausen, 2004). If this is the case, hybridization may play a significant role in the production of biodiversity (Mallet, 2007), and a few empirical examples have even linked the evolution of RI, without a change in ploidy, to hybridization and admixture occurring between different species (Jiggins et al, 2008;Lamichhaney et al, 2017;Melo et al, 2009;Rieseberg et al, 1995;Ungerer et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hypothesis would be reinforced if the putative descendants (MO6146 and MO6147) had a level of 2 n = 8 x = 64. On the other hand, if the ploidy level of these populations corresponded to 2 n = 4 x = 32, a homoploid hybridization process could not be ruled out (Mameli et al, ; Marques et al, ; Nieto‐Feliner et al, ). However, another types of data are necessary (i.e., karyological, cross‐over studies) to understand the biology of these intermediate forms and to interpret them correctly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%