1994
DOI: 10.1097/00019048-199407000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is History Useful in the Diagnosis of Lyme Borreliosis?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By use of the above algorithm, the posttest probability of Lyme disease as a function of the pretest probability is illustrated in figure 1. For selfreferred persons from areas in which Lyme disease is highly endemic with atypical symptoms (e.g., myalgias and fatigue), the prior probability of Lyme disease may be at most 1%-3% [7,13]. In this low-risk setting, the posttest probability of Lyme disease may be only 4%-10%, even though both the EIA and Western blot assay are positive ( figure 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By use of the above algorithm, the posttest probability of Lyme disease as a function of the pretest probability is illustrated in figure 1. For selfreferred persons from areas in which Lyme disease is highly endemic with atypical symptoms (e.g., myalgias and fatigue), the prior probability of Lyme disease may be at most 1%-3% [7,13]. In this low-risk setting, the posttest probability of Lyme disease may be only 4%-10%, even though both the EIA and Western blot assay are positive ( figure 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An anticipated range of pretest probabilities of Lyme disease was estimated from recently published reports from Lyme disease referral centers in areas endemic for Lyme disease [6][7][8][9]. The prevalence of active Lyme disease in this setting ranged from 1% in self-referred patients to 40% in physician-referred patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%