2017
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7f2a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is HESS J1912+101 Associated with an Old Supernova Remnant?

Abstract: HESS J1912+101 is a shell-like TeV source that has no clear counterpart in multiwavelength. Using CO and H i data, we reveal that V LSR ∼ +60 km s −1 molecular clouds (MCs), together with shocked molecular gas and high-velocity neutral atomic shells, are concentrated toward HESS J1912+101. The prominent wing profiles up to V LSR ∼ +80 km s −1 seen in 12 CO (J=1-0 and J=3-2) data, as well as the high-velocity expanding H i shells up to V LSR ∼ +100 km s −1 , exhibit striking redshiftedbroadening relative to the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
4
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For HESS J1912+101, Su et al (2017) derived a distance of about 4.1 kpc based on HI self-absorption data, which is in rough agreement with the dispersion measure based distance of PSR J1913+1011 (Morris et al 2002) of about 4.5 kpc, located near to the centre of HESS J1912+101. The distance agreement suggests that PSR J19133+1011 and HESS J1912+101 are related.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For HESS J1912+101, Su et al (2017) derived a distance of about 4.1 kpc based on HI self-absorption data, which is in rough agreement with the dispersion measure based distance of PSR J1913+1011 (Morris et al 2002) of about 4.5 kpc, located near to the centre of HESS J1912+101. The distance agreement suggests that PSR J19133+1011 and HESS J1912+101 are related.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Also the age estimate by Su et al (2017) for HESS J1912+101 of about 0.7-2.0 10 5 years and that of PSR J193+1011 of about 1.7 10 5 years (Morris et al 2002) agree within the errors and support a physical association. Su et al (2017) suggest a scenario, where the stellar winds of the massive progenitor created a bubble in the molecular material. This stellar wind also had an effect on the ambient magnetic field, which gets compressed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In the case that G21.8−3.0 is not young, the small physical size requires a low initial explosion energy and/or a high ambient density into which it expands (Sedov 1959). However, as we failed to identify any related H i structures, it is difficult to estimate the initial ambient number density and further the age of G21.8−3.0 as done by Su et al (2017) and Kothes et al (2017). For the shell-type SNRs, distance and diameter can also be estimated from the empirical radio surface brightness -diameter (Σ-D) relation.…”
Section: Size Age and Brightnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observing strategy, the instrument, and the quality of the CO observations were described in our recent paper (see Su et al 2017b). Briefly, Each 30 ′ × 30 ′ map was covered with position-switch On-The-Fly mode at least twice in scanning direction along Galactic longitude and latitude to minimize the fluctuation of noise.…”
Section: Co Datamentioning
confidence: 99%