2002
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is HCG 31 undergoing a merger or a fly-by interaction?

Abstract: Abstract. We present Fabry-Perot and multi-object spectroscopy of the galaxies in Hickson compact group 31 (HCG 31). Based upon our Hα data cubes, galaxies A and C are a single entity, showing no discontinuity in their kinematics. Kinematically, galaxy E is probably a component of the A+C complex; otherwise it is a recently detached fragment. Galaxy F appears, both kinematically and chemically, to have formed from material tidally removed from the A+C complex. Galaxies B and G are kinematically distinct from t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
50
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(140 reference statements)
13
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rubin, Hunter, & Ford (1990) concur, identifying two overlapping strongly interacting edge-on disk galaxies (A and C), another edge-on galaxy (B), and a fainter galaxy (D), as well as other more distant galaxies. In contrast, Richer et al (2003) conclude that A and C are a single tidally distorted galaxy, and some of the more distant objects are tidal debris rather than pre-existing galaxies. They find that Galaxy B is kinematically distinct from A+C and is counter-rotating relative to it, thus they conclude that another more distant galaxy (G) is responsible for the tidal features of A+C.…”
Section: 78±mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Rubin, Hunter, & Ford (1990) concur, identifying two overlapping strongly interacting edge-on disk galaxies (A and C), another edge-on galaxy (B), and a fainter galaxy (D), as well as other more distant galaxies. In contrast, Richer et al (2003) conclude that A and C are a single tidally distorted galaxy, and some of the more distant objects are tidal debris rather than pre-existing galaxies. They find that Galaxy B is kinematically distinct from A+C and is counter-rotating relative to it, thus they conclude that another more distant galaxy (G) is responsible for the tidal features of A+C.…”
Section: 78±mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…2c). The two galaxies present similar kinematics suggesting a single entity (Richer et al 2003). At the location of their interaction is a very strong 24 μm source and high levels of infrared emission can be found throughout the whole group (Johnson et al 2007).…”
Section: The Samplementioning
confidence: 85%
“…Figure 2 shows the velocity gradients of the objects A1, A2, E, and F, situated around the pair AϩC (see Fig. 1, top right) and which have been thought to be candidate tidal dwarf galaxies (Hunsberger et al 1996, Iglesias-Páramo & Vílchez 2001, and Richer et al 2003. The curves are not corrected for inclination, and the central position and velocity were chosen such that the curves were as symmetric as possible, with both sides matching when possible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best candidates are objects E and F, for which metallicities were measured, and they were determined to be similar to that of the complex AϩC, suggesting a tidal origin for these objects (Richer et al 2003).…”
Section: Tidal Fragmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation