2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2022.108187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is HbA1c in the first trimester associated with adverse outcomes among pregnant Asian Indian women without gestational diabetes?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, an independent association of HbA1c in the first trimester with adverse pregnancy events was reported by several researchers 17,18 . In an earlier study amongst Asian Indian pregnant women with normal OGTT at 24–28 Gw, we reported an association of HBA1c in the first trimester with preterm birth and primary caesarian delivery 19 . These studies suggest that adverse events triggered by ‘hyperglycemia in first trimester’ are not fully reversible, despite having euglycemia in later pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Furthermore, an independent association of HbA1c in the first trimester with adverse pregnancy events was reported by several researchers 17,18 . In an earlier study amongst Asian Indian pregnant women with normal OGTT at 24–28 Gw, we reported an association of HBA1c in the first trimester with preterm birth and primary caesarian delivery 19 . These studies suggest that adverse events triggered by ‘hyperglycemia in first trimester’ are not fully reversible, despite having euglycemia in later pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Our findings are in accordance with the HAPO study that showed HbA1c ≥5.8% (at 24 -32 gestational weeks) was significantly associated with an increased risk of primary C- section compared to lower HbA1c levels in pregnant women with hyperglycemia ( 10 ). On the other hand, HbA1c in the early trimester at a mean gestational week of 9.25 was significantly associated with primary C-section in non-diabetic Indian women ( 40 ). Researchers hypothesize that abnormal glycemia in early pregnancy, which may be indicated by comparatively high HbA1c at the time of GDM diagnosis, is the mechanism underlying the relationship between primary C-section and higher mid-pregnancy HbA1c levels ( 40 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…On the other hand, HbA1c in the early trimester at a mean gestational week of 9.25 was significantly associated with primary C-section in non-diabetic Indian women ( 40 ). Researchers hypothesize that abnormal glycemia in early pregnancy, which may be indicated by comparatively high HbA1c at the time of GDM diagnosis, is the mechanism underlying the relationship between primary C-section and higher mid-pregnancy HbA1c levels ( 40 ). HbA1c reflects glycemia status in the past several weeks; thus, relatively high HbA1c at the time of GDM diagnosis might be associated with poor glycemic control during early pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Acquisition of data for 14 days would have required the serial insertion of multiple sensors (in a single subject), which was logistically challenging, as many women had normoglycemia. We did not perform a functional data analysis, as done by other authors [ 18 ]; however, considering that the clinical decisions are often taken in terms of CGMS parameters proposed by Hernandez et al, we evaluated them as per their standard format.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent evidence also suggests that women diagnosed with isolated FPG elevation (5.1-6.9 mmol/L) in early pregnancy have adverse pregnancy outcomes, despite a normal OGTT after 24 weeks of gestation [15][16][17]. Similarly, isolated HbA1c elevation during early pregnancy has been associated with adverse outcomes [18,19]. In our study, we evaluated and compared various meal-related parameters and 24-h mean glucose values between women with normoglycemia and those with a missed diagnosis of GDM using strategies alternative to WHO 2013 criteria and found clinically meaningful differences in various glycemia-related parameters.…”
Section: Clinical and Research Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%