2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.05.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is hatchery stocking a help or harm?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
112
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 308 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
5
112
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A second concern is the potential for a reduction in fitness of the stocked population. A number of empirical studies have documented a decrease in reproductive success (RS) in hatchery salmon and trout in the wild (for a review see Araki and Schmid 2010), although there is significant variation in the RS (Anderson et al 2013) and relative RS (Kitada et al 2011). If hatchery fish with lower RS mate with wild fish, the total number of progeny born in the stocked population could be reduced after several generations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second concern is the potential for a reduction in fitness of the stocked population. A number of empirical studies have documented a decrease in reproductive success (RS) in hatchery salmon and trout in the wild (for a review see Araki and Schmid 2010), although there is significant variation in the RS (Anderson et al 2013) and relative RS (Kitada et al 2011). If hatchery fish with lower RS mate with wild fish, the total number of progeny born in the stocked population could be reduced after several generations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enhancement programs are usually performed using a small number of breeders that produce genetically less diverse hatchery progeny (Utter 1998, Gaffney 2006, Roodt-Wilding 2007. When hatchery offspring with low genetic diversity are introduced into wild populations, they tend to lower the overall genetic variability and decrease the fitness of the resulting populations through inbreeding (Gaffney 2006, Roodt-Wilding 2007, Araki & Schmid 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information on relative stock size, habitat, performance (i.e., growth and survival) of stocked fish, and ecosystem influences as identified by trophic impacts would reduce unnecessary stocking investments. The results from this study show that stocking is not a sole quick-fix solution to management of channel catfish and that broader aspects of the ecosystem must be taken into consideration prior to stocking fish (Blankenship and Leber 1995;Lorenzen 2005;Araki & Schmid 2010;Lorenzen et al 2010). Otherwise, the mixed-success of stocking programs is inevitable, but could be greatly reduced if a manager used an experimental-based approach to evaluate the effectiveness of their management actions (Walters & Holling 1990;McAllister & Peterman 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%