2010
DOI: 10.2753/eee0012-8775480301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Growth Pro-Poor in the Balkan Region?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Paat et al (2017) found that local original revenue and economic growth had a negative and significant influence on poverty rates. Ouardighi and Kapetanovic (2010) explain that the concept of pro-poor growth focuses on the relationship between economic growth, inequality and poverty. Growth is not pro-poor because poverty and inequality deteriorate, while economic reforms seem to have a positive influence on welfare, but the overall influence is on small growth for most countries.…”
Section: Local Original Revenuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paat et al (2017) found that local original revenue and economic growth had a negative and significant influence on poverty rates. Ouardighi and Kapetanovic (2010) explain that the concept of pro-poor growth focuses on the relationship between economic growth, inequality and poverty. Growth is not pro-poor because poverty and inequality deteriorate, while economic reforms seem to have a positive influence on welfare, but the overall influence is on small growth for most countries.…”
Section: Local Original Revenuementioning
confidence: 99%