2004
DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb05871.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is grand multiparity an independent predictor of pregnancy risk? A retrospective observational study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Forty‐one studies were included in this review and their baseline characteristics are described in Table 1 (9–49). Thirty‐five studies were excluded: 15 studies reported no neonatal outcome (3, 50–63), seven studies had no comparator group (64–70), four studies reported only on a very specific population (71–76), three were reviews or editorials (2, 77, 78), one study compared two socioeconomic groups (79), one study reported longitudinal data with multiple observations (80), and one was an outcome based study rather than exposure based study (81).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forty‐one studies were included in this review and their baseline characteristics are described in Table 1 (9–49). Thirty‐five studies were excluded: 15 studies reported no neonatal outcome (3, 50–63), seven studies had no comparator group (64–70), four studies reported only on a very specific population (71–76), three were reviews or editorials (2, 77, 78), one study compared two socioeconomic groups (79), one study reported longitudinal data with multiple observations (80), and one was an outcome based study rather than exposure based study (81).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%