2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3083500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Gender in the Eye of the Beholder? Identifying Cultural Attitudes with Art Auction Prices

Abstract: In the secondary art market, artists play no active role. This allows us to isolate cultural influences on the demand for female artists' work from supply-side factors. Using 1.5 million auction transactions in 45 countries, we document a 47.6% gender discount in auction prices for paintings. The discount is higher in countries with greater gender inequality. In experiments, participants are unable to guess the gender of an artist simply by looking at a painting and they vary in their preferences for paintings… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is equivalent to an average price difference of 16.8% which is smaller than the unconditional discount of 47.6% documented byAdams et al (2017). Consistent with this study, we also find a negative price difference (−8.3%) for female artists when we only consider contemporary artists or artworks selling for more than 1 million (−17.9%).…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is equivalent to an average price difference of 16.8% which is smaller than the unconditional discount of 47.6% documented byAdams et al (2017). Consistent with this study, we also find a negative price difference (−8.3%) for female artists when we only consider contemporary artists or artworks selling for more than 1 million (−17.9%).…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Consistent with this study, we also find a negative price difference (−8.3%) for female artists when we only consider contemporary artists or artworks selling for more than 1 million (−17.9%). It is likely that differences in sample compositions of our studies drive differences in results Adams et al (2017). use a sample of 1.5 million global auction transactions between 1970 and 2013 (62,442 artists).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the current art world and current artists, it can be found research on gender differences in perception of, e.g., graffiti works and their creators (Chinangure & Mapaire, 2019) or punk musicians (Garrigós, 2017). The more general approach to artist's identity through gender lens reveals conclusions about differences in career-decision making and self-management by artists (Bennett & Hennekam, 2018;Hennekam & Bennett, 2016), differences in perception of paintings as the way of consideration of the effective communication (Abodunrin, 2017), differences in identification of the cultural attitudes by art beholders in the auction context (Adams et al, 2017), inequality in artistic careers based on gender and artist archetypes (Miller, 2016), differences in music perception (Shakespeare et al, 2020;Szostak, 2020b).…”
Section: Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the correlations between paintings on the on the one hand and stocks and bonds on the other are negative, we study whether investments in paintings contribute to optimal portfolio allocation. The academic finance literature has focused on the art performance (Mei and Moses, 2002;Renneboog and Spaenjers, 2013;Korteweg, Kräussl, and Verwijmeren, 2016;Lovo and Spaenjers, 2018), its financial and macro-economic market drivers such as equity market evolution and income inequality (Goetzmann, Renneboog, and Spaenjers, 2011), sentiment and hypes (Pénasse, Renneboog, and Spaenjers, 2014), gender biases (Adams, Kräussl, Navone, and Verwijmeren, 2017;Bocart, Gertsberg, and Pownall, 2017;Cameron, Goetzmann, and Nozari, 2019), the impact of color (Ma, Noussair and Renneboog, 2021), behavioral anomalies such as anchoring (Beggs and Graddy, 2009;Graddy et al, 2015), art market bubbles (Pénasse and Renneboog, 2021), and artists' death as a supply shock (Pénasse, Renneboog, and Scheinkman, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%