1995
DOI: 10.1071/eg995167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is full 3-D Inversion Necessary for Interpreting EM Data?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For EM methods, Kambalda-style models have been the subject of previous 3-D EM forward modeling studies such as Stolz et al (1995) and Zhdanov et al (2000). However, there are specific limitations on EM methods for the practical exploration of Kambalda-style NiS exploration in Australia and these are imposed by the following factors (Trench and Williams, 1994): a) the generally small size of the deposits (0.5 to 3.0 Mt); b) the extreme depth of weathering in the regolith; and c) the abundance of anomalous responses from noneconomic targets.…”
Section: The Generalized Minimal Residual Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For EM methods, Kambalda-style models have been the subject of previous 3-D EM forward modeling studies such as Stolz et al (1995) and Zhdanov et al (2000). However, there are specific limitations on EM methods for the practical exploration of Kambalda-style NiS exploration in Australia and these are imposed by the following factors (Trench and Williams, 1994): a) the generally small size of the deposits (0.5 to 3.0 Mt); b) the extreme depth of weathering in the regolith; and c) the abundance of anomalous responses from noneconomic targets.…”
Section: The Generalized Minimal Residual Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described by Stone and Masterman (1998), Kambalda-style orebodies occur at, or close to, the basal contact between the lowermost komatiite flow (ultramafic) and footwall metabasalts (mafic). The NiS ore is comprised of basal massive, matrix and disseminated sulfide ores within which the nickel grade decreases upward.…”
Section: -D Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For EM methods, Kambalda-style models have been the subject of previous 3-D EM forward modeling studies such as Stolz et al (1995) and Zhdanov et al (2000). However, there are specific limitations on EM methods for the practical exploration of Kambalda-style NiS exploration in Australia and these are imposed by the following factors (Trench and Williams, 1994): a) the generally small size of the deposits (0.5 to 3.0 Mt); b) the extreme depth of weathering in the regolith; and c) the abundance of anomalous responses from noneconomic targets.…”
Section: -D Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%