2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is field-measured tree height as reliable as believed – A comparison study of tree height estimates from field measurement, airborne laser scanning and terrestrial laser scanning in a boreal forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
115
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
11
115
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With multi-scan data, the completeness level clearly improved, and the respective completeness of tree detection was 90%, 80%, and 50%. The reliability of tree height estimation has been reported to be relatively low (i.e., several meters) when using TLS [12,31]. Nevertheless, it is possible to improve the point cloud quality by acquiring a combined point cloud from multiple scanning positions [8] and by considering the spatial arrangement of the scanners [32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With multi-scan data, the completeness level clearly improved, and the respective completeness of tree detection was 90%, 80%, and 50%. The reliability of tree height estimation has been reported to be relatively low (i.e., several meters) when using TLS [12,31]. Nevertheless, it is possible to improve the point cloud quality by acquiring a combined point cloud from multiple scanning positions [8] and by considering the spatial arrangement of the scanners [32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overlapping of stereoscopic aerial images already exceeds 80% [55], which enables the use of image matching technology [56]. On the basis of the data provided by the cyclic aerial survey of Slovenia, we determined it would not be necessary to replace the technology of laser scanning, as it is capable of exceptional resolution of ∼450 points/m 2 and also it could possibly be affordable for large scale surveys in the coming years [57]. Using cutting edge ALS techniques, it is possible to acquire tree height measurements more reliably than using conventional field measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benchmark data also showed better segmentation results when fitting the crowns, hence crown fitting for tree top detection is recommended for real forests. The localization accuracy itself can be further assessed when accurate ground truth of crown locations are available, which can be difficult by either field measurements or other sensing techniques [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%