2003
DOI: 10.1023/a:1022320227637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Fe deficiency rather than P deficiency the cause of cluster root formation in Casuarina species?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CRs typically have a morphology with densely positioned lateral rootlets but the CR morphology varies greatly among the CRforming plant species that belong to the family Proteaceae, the legume genus Lupinus and some of the actinorhizal plants (Lambers et al 2006;Skene 1998). The actinorhizal plant seabuckthorn in this study was found to have a CR morphology most similar to what has been described for the actinorhizal plant Casuarina sp in the family Casuarinaceae (Zaïd et al 2003a) and also to the legume Lupinus albus (Johnson et al 1996;Skene 2001). From a taxonomic perspective this is coherent since legumes and all actinorhizal plants are placed in the Eurosid I clade while Proteaceae is more distantly related among eudicots of angiosperm plants (The Angiosperm Phylogeny 2003).…”
Section: Seabuckthorn Forms Cluster Rootssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CRs typically have a morphology with densely positioned lateral rootlets but the CR morphology varies greatly among the CRforming plant species that belong to the family Proteaceae, the legume genus Lupinus and some of the actinorhizal plants (Lambers et al 2006;Skene 1998). The actinorhizal plant seabuckthorn in this study was found to have a CR morphology most similar to what has been described for the actinorhizal plant Casuarina sp in the family Casuarinaceae (Zaïd et al 2003a) and also to the legume Lupinus albus (Johnson et al 1996;Skene 2001). From a taxonomic perspective this is coherent since legumes and all actinorhizal plants are placed in the Eurosid I clade while Proteaceae is more distantly related among eudicots of angiosperm plants (The Angiosperm Phylogeny 2003).…”
Section: Seabuckthorn Forms Cluster Rootssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…CRs were shown to be formed under P deficiency by the shrubs Myrica gale (Crocker and Schwintzer 1993) and Morella (formerly Myrica) cerifera (Louis et al 1990) in Myricaceae and by several Alnus sp in Betulaceae (Hurd and Schwintzer 1996). CR formation by the tree Casuarina spp in Casuarinaceae was demonstrated under both P and Fe deficiency (Diem et al 2000;Reddell et al 1997;Zaïd et al 2003a). Although the occurrence of cluster roots on seabuckthorn was cited as an unpublished observation in a review (Skene 1998) as the representative of Eleagnaceae, there has to our knowledge not been any experimental study presented on CR formation by seabuckthorn.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some cluster rooted species, such as lupins, can also form nitrogen-fixing symbiosis, they tend to be non-or very weakly mycorrhizal (but see Boulet and Lambers 2005). Thus, cluster roots represent an alternative mechanism to capture soil P, although Fe uptake may also be important (Zaïd et al 2003). Originally thought to be confined to the Proteaceae, these roots were previously termed 'proteoid' (Purnell 1960), however, root clusters have now been shown to develop on a range of different plant species belonging to a number of different families including Betulaceae, Fabaceae (notably lupins), Casuarinaceae, Myricaceae, Mimosaceae, Eleagnaceae and Moreacea (Skene 1998), thus, the more inclusive 'cluster roots' is now used.…”
Section: Specialised Root Morphologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main factors that favours the formation of cluster roots is a low supply of P (Skene et al 1996;Gilbert et al 2000;Shane et al 2004a;Shane and Lambers 2005) or iron (Zaid et al 2003). The factors that induce the development of CR in Chilean Proteaceae have been poorly studied, however some authors proposed interaction with microorganisms within the rhizosphere (Grinbergs et al 1987;Ramirez et al 1990Ramirez et al , 2004.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%