2018
DOI: 10.1177/1403494818765894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is fatigue after work a barrier for leisure-time physical activity? Cross-sectional study among 10,000 adults from the general working population

Abstract: The duration of high-intensity leisure-time physical activity gradually decreases with increased work-related fatigue in workers with physically demanding jobs. Older workers perform less high-intensity physical activity than younger workers. Workplaces should consider initiatives to allow workers with physically demanding jobs and older workers to perform physical exercise during working hours and thereby increase physical capacity to meet the job demands.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, high physical workload and work-related fatigue can exhaust workers leaving less energy to perform physical activity in leisure time. 28,31 The contrasting findings between our and previous research can also be due to differences in methodology including the measurement of physical activity. While most previous studies explicitly measured leisure time physical activity, in the present study, the questions about physical activity left room for the inclusion of leisure time as well as occupational time physical activity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…For example, high physical workload and work-related fatigue can exhaust workers leaving less energy to perform physical activity in leisure time. 28,31 The contrasting findings between our and previous research can also be due to differences in methodology including the measurement of physical activity. While most previous studies explicitly measured leisure time physical activity, in the present study, the questions about physical activity left room for the inclusion of leisure time as well as occupational time physical activity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…In, for example, Del Duca et al [ 10 ] mentioned earlier, many individuals who were otherwise categorized as inactive, in fact, met recommendations for PA when data on TPA were included as opposed to when only LTPA was counted. It is reasonable to assume that people of lower SES have less surplus energy to be physically active during their leisure time, because of the physical strain of their work [ 74 ]. Moreover, there is reason to believe that people of higher SES are more active in their leisure time, out of necessity, because they are less physically active at work [ 67 ], and not merely because of their ability to finance their activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this risk could be, in a way, attenuated due to the previous use of the questionnaire in other studies, as well as because the psychosocial work environment related-questions were extracted from the validated Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. 25 Despite the fact that we have controlled a wide range of potential confounders, other variables such as occupational physical activity might better reflect the effects of the physical efforts in the workplace, since it has been observed to affect LTPA 40 and LTSA. 12 Besides, some of the control variables, for example, chronic disease, may act as mediator rather than confounder.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%