2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is excision of testicular nubbin necessary in vanishing testis syndrome?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in a systematic review regarding the presence of viable germ cells in remnants concluded that there is no solid evidence to establish that its routine excision is indicated even in an inguinal or scrotal position [20]. Laparoscopic observations, along with anatomical and pathological findings (such as calcifications and atrophic residual tissue), support the hypothesis that the disappearance of the testis occurs as a result of a vascular accident during the descent of the testicles into the inguinal canal under hormonal control [19,20]. e existing literature clearly highlights the importance of the anatomical aspect during surgery when investigating the spermatic vessels and the internal inguinal ring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in a systematic review regarding the presence of viable germ cells in remnants concluded that there is no solid evidence to establish that its routine excision is indicated even in an inguinal or scrotal position [20]. Laparoscopic observations, along with anatomical and pathological findings (such as calcifications and atrophic residual tissue), support the hypothesis that the disappearance of the testis occurs as a result of a vascular accident during the descent of the testicles into the inguinal canal under hormonal control [19,20]. e existing literature clearly highlights the importance of the anatomical aspect during surgery when investigating the spermatic vessels and the internal inguinal ring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natajara et al reported that viable germ cells and seminiferous tubules are found in 1 in 10 and 1 in 20, respectively, in inguinal/scrotal nubbins [8]. Some researchers differ and argue that the risk of malignancy development from nubbin tissues is very low and that the defined samples are not strong, thus finding is no strong evidence for routine nubbin excision [8,25]. In our study, it was observed that the testicular vessels ended blindly before entering the inguinal canal in 3 of the cases where no intra-abdominal testis was detected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Woodford et al evaluated the histopathological findings of the excised testicular nubbins. None of the patient was found to have viable germ cells [8]. Based on this, they suggested that the concerns of development of malignant germ cell tumour in the retained testicular nubbins are unfounded and there is no need to excise the testicular nubbins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%