2013
DOI: 10.1111/apa.12482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is excess male infant mortality from sudden infant death syndrome and other respiratory diseases X‐linked?

Abstract: The constant ~50% male excess for quite different causes of respiratory death suggests they all have a common terminal event and that is acute anoxic encephalopathy. We hypothesise that this constant male excess phenomenon must be caused by a single X-linked gene, with a recessive condition, leading to a predisposition to succumb to acute anoxic encephalopathy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As described above, all infant mortality from respiratory causes has an apparent 50% X-linkage male excess rate for equal numbers of XY males and XX females at risk (we neglect chromosomal abnormalities, such as XXY male and XXX female, and assume no infanticides). As also shown, there is no male excess (0%) for cardiac failures, which include congenital anomalies related to genetic variants on the 22 autosomes, which males and females have with equal probabilities, assuming HWE (40, 41). That is, for every two females dying from respiratory causes, three males will die, and for every two females dying of cardiac causes, two males will die.…”
Section: Prediction Of Male Fraction Of All Total Infant Mortality Frmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…As described above, all infant mortality from respiratory causes has an apparent 50% X-linkage male excess rate for equal numbers of XY males and XX females at risk (we neglect chromosomal abnormalities, such as XXY male and XXX female, and assume no infanticides). As also shown, there is no male excess (0%) for cardiac failures, which include congenital anomalies related to genetic variants on the 22 autosomes, which males and females have with equal probabilities, assuming HWE (40, 41). That is, for every two females dying from respiratory causes, three males will die, and for every two females dying of cardiac causes, two males will die.…”
Section: Prediction Of Male Fraction Of All Total Infant Mortality Frmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Approximately one-half of SIDS victims have a slight upper airway infection before death (124) with males reported to have an excess of infant mortality from respiratory deaths as well as SIDS (125). The risk of SIDS also increases with the number of siblings, otherwise known as “birth order” (124), another known SIDS risk factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For proof of its causation, the predicted missing X-linked p = 1/3 dominant allele that is protective of neuronal cell death by acute anoxic encephalopathy by enabling the infant to shift from aerobic to anaerobic oxidation must be identified [3,14]. This may be difficult because of the likely presence of false positive SIDS in the study cohorts, where a non-SIDS cardiac cause of death or a case of infanticide may have been missed.…”
Section: Scandinavian Journal Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have shown previously that: 1) SIDS cannot be a cardiac death, because SIDS has a constant 50% male excess and cardiac infant deaths have a 0% male excess [1][2][3]; 2) SIDS is not likely to be caused by a brainstem-abnormality because SIDS ages have a lognormal age distribution, sparing infants at or shortly after birth, whereas infants born with fatal neurological defects have maximum mortality shortly after birth [4][5][6]. Rather, we show that SIDS have the same gender distribution (50% excess male rate) as infant deaths from respiratory infection [5,7] and a similar 4-parameter lognormal age distribution as with hospital admissions for bronchiolitis [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%