2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2012.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is European benchmarking methodology favouring a narrow segment of air navigation service providers?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, we increase the flexibility of our model, since we do not impose a fixed factor of substitution between the outputs, but we leave to the non-parametric model to calibrate the efficiency frontier. On a related matter, Grebenšek and Magister (2013) suggest that the use of composite flight hours, as calculated by EUROCONTROL, is a possible source of bias in ANSP benchmarking exercises. Table 3 presents the individual ANSP efficiency scores for 2010.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, we increase the flexibility of our model, since we do not impose a fixed factor of substitution between the outputs, but we leave to the non-parametric model to calibrate the efficiency frontier. On a related matter, Grebenšek and Magister (2013) suggest that the use of composite flight hours, as calculated by EUROCONTROL, is a possible source of bias in ANSP benchmarking exercises. Table 3 presents the individual ANSP efficiency scores for 2010.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue is in most papers solved by using a consolidated product index: composite flight hours, a weighted sum of instrumental flight rules (IFR) airport movements controlled and en-route flight hours controlled. However, as Grebensek and Magister (2013) and also Standfuß et al (2018) suggest, the use of composite flight hours might bias efficiency benchmarking results. COM-PAIR (2017) estimates a cost function for each output, which requires distinguishing costs connected to terminal services from costs related to en-route services.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite being widely used in Europe e.g. Button and Neiva (2013), the validity of this framework was questioned by Grebenšek and Magister (2013), who showed that the methodology tends to over-estimate productivity for busy ATC centres.…”
Section: Previous Research On Atc Cost-efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%