Is etiology of amputation correlated with psychophysiological and psychosocial aspects of pain?

Daschbach, P.; Houle, Timothy T.; Newman, D.; Ranjbaran, Ziba; Hyun, Park Dall; Harden, R. Norman

doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2005.01.092

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These authors went further to suggest that difference in amputation etiology may be related to benefits that come with amputation for those whose limb was amputated because of a chronic condition. These authors did not cite other studies that found that individuals with nontraumatic amputations report higher rates of depression (Cansever, Uzun, Yildiz, Ates, & Atesalp, 2003), greater impairment and subjective distress (Daschbach, Houle, Newman, Ranjbaran, & Harden, 2005), and lower levels of social integration 2 years after amputation (Williams et al, 2004), compared to individuals with traumatic amputations.…”

Section: How Does Amputation Etiology Affect Outcomes?mentioning

confidence: 95%

To lump or to split? Comparing individuals with traumatic and nontraumatic limb loss in the first year after amputation.

Kratz

Williams

Turner

et al. 2010

Rehabilitation Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: How Does Amputation Etiology Affect Outcomes?mentioning

confidence: 95%

To lump or to split? Comparing individuals with traumatic and nontraumatic limb loss in the first year after amputation.

Kratz

Williams

Turner

et al. 2010

Rehabilitation Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Information extracted included population demographics (country, mean age, sex), amputation characteristics, including type of amputation (traumatic or atraumatic), location of amputation, time since amputation (population mean in years) and prevalence or incidence estimates (%) of any phantom limb phenomena (PLS, PLP, telescoping). Amputation types were categorized into traumatic and atraumatic due to differences in management, complications and psychological adjustment (Daschbach et al., 2005). Atraumatic amputations could include, but were not limited to, diabetes, non‐diabetic peripheral vascular disease, cancer or tumour, post‐surgical emboli, infection or orthopaedic deformity.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prevalence and incidence of phantom limb pain, phantom limb sensations and telescoping in amputees: A systematic rapid review

Stankevicius

Wallwork

Summers

et al. 2020

European Journal of Pain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and objective: This systematic, rapid review aimed to critically appraise and synthesize the recent literature (2014-2019) evaluating the incidence and prevalence of post-amputation phantom limb pain (PLP) and sensation (PLS). Databases and data treatment: Five databases (Medline, Embase, Emcare, PsychInfo, Web of Science) and Google Scholar were searched, with two independent reviewers completing eligibility screening, risk of bias assessment and data extraction. Results: The search identified 1,350 studies with 12 cross-sectional and 3 prospective studies included. Studies evaluated traumatic (n = 5), atraumatic (n = 4), and combined traumatic/atraumatic (n = 6) amputee populations, ranging from 1 month to 33 years post-amputation. Study heterogeneity prevented data pooling. The majority of studies had a high risk of bias, primarily due to limited generalizability. Three studies evaluated PLP incidence, ranging from 2.2% (atraumatic; 1 month) to 41% (combined; 3 months) and 82% (combined; 12 months). Only one study evaluated PLS/telescoping incidence. Across contrasting populations, PLP point prevalence was between 6.7%-88.1%, 1 to 3-month period prevalence was between 49%-93.5%, and lifetime prevalence was high at 76%-87%. Point prevalence of PLS was 32.4%-90%, period prevalence was 65% (1 month) and 56.9% (3 months), and lifetime prevalence was 87%. Telescoping was less prevalent, highest among traumatic amputees (24.6%) within a 1-month prevalence period. Variations in population type (e.g. amputation characteristics) and incidence and prevalence measures likely influence the large variability seen here. Conclusions: This review found that lifetime prevalence was the highest, with most individuals experiencing some type of phantom phenomena at some point post-amputation.

show abstract

Is etiology of amputation correlated with psychophysiological and psychosocial aspects of pain?

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

To lump or to split? Comparing individuals with traumatic and nontraumatic limb loss in the first year after amputation.

To lump or to split? Comparing individuals with traumatic and nontraumatic limb loss in the first year after amputation.

Prevalence and incidence of phantom limb pain, phantom limb sensations and telescoping in amputees: A systematic rapid review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About