2019
DOI: 10.1177/0031721719879152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is ESSA a retreat from equity?

Abstract: The passage of ESSA has ushered in a new era of educational governance and leadership, but questions remain regarding how well the new law will protect students’ rights to an equitable education. Lance Fusarelli and Jennifer Ayscue examine key provisions of the law, provide an update of states’ implementation, and speculate about whether ESSA will encourage states to create policies to reduce disparities or whether the return to state and local control will further exacerbate inequities. They encourage educato… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initial reviews of state ESSA plans—those plans federally mandated by ESSA legislation for state education agencies to develop and adjust until met with federal approval, and hereafter referred to as “plans”—suggest that high-stakes accountability policies and the identification of underperforming schools appear to continue relatively unchanged since the early 2000s. The crux is less about policy flexibility and more about how states interpret and implement policies (Fusarelli & Ayscue, 2019). Various dimensions of school quality and performance are potentially undermined by summative assessment scores regardless of the factors that go into making those scores (Hough et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial reviews of state ESSA plans—those plans federally mandated by ESSA legislation for state education agencies to develop and adjust until met with federal approval, and hereafter referred to as “plans”—suggest that high-stakes accountability policies and the identification of underperforming schools appear to continue relatively unchanged since the early 2000s. The crux is less about policy flexibility and more about how states interpret and implement policies (Fusarelli & Ayscue, 2019). Various dimensions of school quality and performance are potentially undermined by summative assessment scores regardless of the factors that go into making those scores (Hough et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ESSA requires states to explicitly address equity concerns, such as funding disparities, in their plans (L. D. Fusarelli & Ayscue, 2019).…”
Section: Overview Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These considerations apply to virtually all postgraduate fields, including law (Manzi, 2020), medical school (Blake, 2012), and graduate programs in general (Danvers, 2019). In K-12 testing, legislation beginning with No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) expanded debate about equity that continues to this day (Fusarelli & Ayscue, 2019;Harris, 2012;Karp, 2003;Steinhardt, 2018). In credentialing, issues of fairness, equity, and access have spurred controversy and litigation for decades (c.f., Phillips, 2017;Rebel, 1986;Wax, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%