2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11031-013-9357-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is energy expenditure in emotion regulation dependent on individual differences and the specific emotion in question?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Self-control depletion task Physical exercise Time after the first self-regulation task Characteristics of participants 38 Lifting a 1.5-kg weight as long as possible Lifting a 1.5-kg weight as long as possible simultaneously or not with a counting task Time to complete a fatigue scale and the BMIS Young adults, psychology students Martin Ginis and Bray (2010) 45 Modified Stroop Task 10 min pedaling on a cycle ergometer at a self-determined RPE of 5 105 Emotion suppression task Maintaining handgrip as long as possible Immediately Young adults, undergraduate students Abbreviations: MVC ¼ maximum voluntary contraction; BMIS ¼ brief mood introspection scale 106 ; PANAS ¼ positive and negative affect schedule 107 ; RPE ¼ rate of perceived exertion 108 .…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-control depletion task Physical exercise Time after the first self-regulation task Characteristics of participants 38 Lifting a 1.5-kg weight as long as possible Lifting a 1.5-kg weight as long as possible simultaneously or not with a counting task Time to complete a fatigue scale and the BMIS Young adults, psychology students Martin Ginis and Bray (2010) 45 Modified Stroop Task 10 min pedaling on a cycle ergometer at a self-determined RPE of 5 105 Emotion suppression task Maintaining handgrip as long as possible Immediately Young adults, undergraduate students Abbreviations: MVC ¼ maximum voluntary contraction; BMIS ¼ brief mood introspection scale 106 ; PANAS ¼ positive and negative affect schedule 107 ; RPE ¼ rate of perceived exertion 108 .…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we aggregated across motivational and behavioral utility domains, future research may wish to examine these domains separately should a theoretically-driven need arise. Further, future research may wish to examine perceived utility of emotion by assessing processes outside of conscious awareness, such as performance on a handgrip task (Chow, Berenbaum, & Flores, 2013b). As is the case with any self-report instrument, the ability of individuals to report on their beliefs and behavior may depend in part on other factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although much research has focused on neuroticism and extraversion as predictors of positive emotions (e.g., Charles et al, 2001; McCabe & Fleeson, 2012; McNiel & Fleeson, 2006; Verduyn & Brans, 2012), less is known about the role of conscientiousness in positive emotions. Conscientiousness consists of different facets, such as impulse/self-control, orderliness, and industriousness (e.g., Roberts, Chernyshenko, Stark, & Goldberg, 2005), which all are indicators of a successful self-regulation (Chow, Berenbaum, & Flores, 2013; Javaras et al, 2012; Pocnet, Dupuis, Congard, & Jopp, 2017). Moreover, previous studies suggest that individuals high in conscientiousness experience positive feelings more often and more intensively than individuals low in conscientiousness (e.g., Hill & Allemand, 2012; Letzring & Adamcik, 2015; J.…”
Section: The Role Of Conscientiousness In Age Differences In Positive...mentioning
confidence: 99%