Is early detection of abused children possible?: a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of the identification of abused children

Abstract

BackgroundEarly detection of abused children could help decrease mortality and morbidity related to this major public health problem. Several authors have proposed tools to screen for child maltreatment. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the evidence on accuracy of tools proposed to identify abused children before their death and assess if any were adapted to screening.MethodsWe searched in PUBMED, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, FRANCIS and PASCAL for studies estimating diagnostic accuracy of tools identifying neglect, or physical, psychological or sexual abuse of children, published in English or French from 1961 to April 2012. We extracted selected information about study design, patient populations, assessment methods, and the accuracy parameters. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS criteria.ResultsA total of 2 280 articles were identified. Thirteen studies were selected, of which seven dealt with physical abuse, four with sexual abuse, one with emotional abuse, and one with any abuse and physical neglect. Study quality was low, even when not considering the lack of gold standard for detection of abused children. In 11 studies, instruments identified abused children only when they had clinical symptoms. Sensitivity of tests varied between 0.26 (95% confidence interval [0.17-0.36]) and 0.97 [0.84-1], and specificity between 0.51 [0.39-0.63] and 1 [0.95-1]. The sensitivity was greater than 90% only for three tests: the absence of scalp swelling to identify children victims of inflicted head injury; a decision tool to identify physically-abused children among those hospitalized in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit; and a parental interview integrating twelve child symptoms to identify sexually-abused children. When the sensitivity was high, the specificity was always smaller than 90%.ConclusionsIn 2012, there is low-quality evidence on the accuracy of instruments for identifying abused children. Identified tools were not adapted to screening because of low sensitivity and late identification of abused children when they have already serious consequences of maltreatment. Development of valid screening instruments is a pre-requisite before considering screening programs.

Exploring the acceptability of a clinical decision rule to identify paediatric burns due to child abuse or neglect

“…A recent case–control study of children aged <3 years admitted with a burn showed that almost one-third of children with burns had been referred to social services because of child protection (CP) concerns by their sixth birthday 10. Recent systematic reviews have shown a lack of effective, validated, generic ED tools for identifying childhood maltreatment 11 12. An injury-specific tool may be more effective, as in other disciplines, for example, for identifying head injury 13…”

Nurturing care: promoting early childhood development

“…The RMNCH and nutrition reviews relied primarily on five recent overviews of reviews, including the Lancet 2014 Every Newborn series, (13) (21) A meta-analysis of education programmes was conducted to determine non-cognitive developmental benefits of parenting and early childhood education programmes, as this information was not available in existing systematic reviews. The maltreatment review updated the Lancet 2009 series for prevention of child maltreatment (22) and a systematic review of reviews of interventions to reduce child maltreatment, (23) in addition to a review of 14 recent reviews of maltreatment prevention interventions, including home visiting, (24)(25)(26), parenting-training programmes, (27,28) sexual abuse prevention programmes, (29,30) universal campaigns to prevent physical abuse,(31) behavioural and counseling interventions,(32) detection of child maltreatment, (33) and three review studies on prevention of child maltreatment. (34)(35)(36) The social protection review examined five systematic reviews that focused on the effects of social programmes, including conditional and unconditional cash transfers and microcredit schemes.…”

Child neglect and abuse: a global glimpse within the framework of evidence perspective

“…), and three studies that deal with abuse alone (Bailhache et al. ; Kalmakis & Chandler ; Kristman‐Valente & Wells ). Finally, it was determined that there was only one study (Ji & Finkelhor ) that dealt with physical abuse.…”