1982
DOI: 10.1159/000131782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is DNA methylation responsible for mammalian X chromosome inactivation?

Abstract: Mohandas et al. (1981) have proposed that mammalian X chromosome inactivation involves segmental methylation of cytosine residues in the DNA at multiple sites along the X chromosome. Using antibodies specific for 5-methylcytosine, we have found no detectable difference in the extent of methylation of the DNA in the two X chromosomes of owl monkey or human females. Thus inactivation (facultative heterochromatization) of the X chromosome is not due to, or associated with, intense DNA methylation comparable to th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wolf and Migeon felt that ubiquitous methylation was not involved in X inactivation and that there is variation in methylation at a given site even in clonally derived cell lines. Our results are in agreement with both of these conclusions and with cytologic observations using anti-5-methylcytosine antibodies that fail to discriminate between active and inactive X chromosomes (26).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Wolf and Migeon felt that ubiquitous methylation was not involved in X inactivation and that there is variation in methylation at a given site even in clonally derived cell lines. Our results are in agreement with both of these conclusions and with cytologic observations using anti-5-methylcytosine antibodies that fail to discriminate between active and inactive X chromosomes (26).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…If the increment is similar for inactive X chromosomes, it could not have been detected in the cytological analysis of stained preparations with antibodies specific for m5C (15). By this method, one can apparently detect only a twofold increase (15); in humans, this would correspond to an increase of 4 to 5% m5C (based on the m5C contents observed in human DNA [91).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the increment is similar for inactive X chromosomes, it could not have been detected in the cytological analysis of stained preparations with antibodies specific for m5C (15). By this method, one can apparently detect only a twofold increase (15); in humans, this would correspond to an increase of 4 to 5% m5C (based on the m5C contents observed in human DNA [91). The studies in which HpaII and MspI were used to detect methylation at specific (but undefined) regions of the X chromosome (24) could probably have detected such an increase, but only if most of the methylated sites were CCGG and these were distributed fairly evenly along the X chromosome.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example. 5-AC induces the activation of the X-linked hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase gene (13), but no differences could be detected in the extent of DNA methylation between active and inactive Xlinked sequences by as sensitive a method as fixation of 5-methylcytosine (5-meCy)-directed antibodies (16). The possibility thus remains that 5-AC may additionally act through another, as yet unknown, mechanism which is distinct from DNA hypomethylation and is equally able to account for the striking properties of this drug.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%