2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2010.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is directly measured low-density lipoprotein clinically equivalent to calculated low-density lipoprotein?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors of a recent study reported poor agreement between results calculated with the Friedewald equation and a direct LDL-C assay from Siemens. 17 Despite a good correlation between these methods, more than 25% of results differed by more than 30 mg/dL, 17 leading the authors to conclude that the two methods do not consistently provide similar clinical information.…”
Section: The Friedewald Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of a recent study reported poor agreement between results calculated with the Friedewald equation and a direct LDL-C assay from Siemens. 17 Despite a good correlation between these methods, more than 25% of results differed by more than 30 mg/dL, 17 leading the authors to conclude that the two methods do not consistently provide similar clinical information.…”
Section: The Friedewald Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, a study examining the correlation between 145 pairs of Friedewald-calculated and directly measured LDL-C found that one-third of the measurements had a >15 mg/dl difference and onefourth had a >20 mg/dl difference [19].…”
Section: What Is Non Hdl Cholesterol?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct measurement of LDL-C is not recommended as not all laboratories are able to adequately perform this test and even under ideal conditions, the laboratory coefficient of deviation is often quite large. 67 A recommended panel of laboratory tests for initial evaluation is presented in Box 3.…”
Section: Laboratory Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%