2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpp.2017.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is differential diagnosis attainable in disarticulated pathological bone remains? A case-study from a late 19th/early 20th century necropolis from Juncal (Porto de Mós, Portugal)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 64 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the commingled nature of remains may render the calculation and interpretation of disease prevalence challenging (Perry and Edwards 2021). Despite these many limitations, recent paleopathological studies in Europe and the Middle East have demonstrated the possibilities of differential diagnoses of these challenging commingled contexts (e.g., Abegg et al 2021;Assis et al 2018;Austin 2017;Brickley and Buckberry, 2015;Judd 2019;Perry and Edwards 2021). Perry and Edwards (2021) advocate for the use of the biological approach when carrying out differential diagnoses of skeletal lesions which examines each lesion independently and "identifies the underlying biological processes that could produce the skeletal lesions observed" (Perry and Edwards 2021:222), explaining that such an approach is preferred by many paleopathologists as it "allow recognition of co-or multimorbid conditions, rather than assuming all observations present a suite of skeletal lesions from one condition" (Perry and Edwards 2021:222).…”
Section: Challenges and Recent Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the commingled nature of remains may render the calculation and interpretation of disease prevalence challenging (Perry and Edwards 2021). Despite these many limitations, recent paleopathological studies in Europe and the Middle East have demonstrated the possibilities of differential diagnoses of these challenging commingled contexts (e.g., Abegg et al 2021;Assis et al 2018;Austin 2017;Brickley and Buckberry, 2015;Judd 2019;Perry and Edwards 2021). Perry and Edwards (2021) advocate for the use of the biological approach when carrying out differential diagnoses of skeletal lesions which examines each lesion independently and "identifies the underlying biological processes that could produce the skeletal lesions observed" (Perry and Edwards 2021:222), explaining that such an approach is preferred by many paleopathologists as it "allow recognition of co-or multimorbid conditions, rather than assuming all observations present a suite of skeletal lesions from one condition" (Perry and Edwards 2021:222).…”
Section: Challenges and Recent Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%