2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2014.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is different degree of individual specialization in three spider species caused by distinct selection pressures?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strong influence of IGP on the spatial niche of spiders has been observed in, for example, wolf spiders (Lycosidae) (Folz et al, 2006;Schmidt & Rypstra, 2010). In addition, a further study found indirect evidence of the influence of interspecific competition on the population of P. albidus from the other two philodromids (Michalko & Pekár, 2014). However, further study is required to verify the effect of IGP on spatial niche differences.…”
Section: Spatial Nichementioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The strong influence of IGP on the spatial niche of spiders has been observed in, for example, wolf spiders (Lycosidae) (Folz et al, 2006;Schmidt & Rypstra, 2010). In addition, a further study found indirect evidence of the influence of interspecific competition on the population of P. albidus from the other two philodromids (Michalko & Pekár, 2014). However, further study is required to verify the effect of IGP on spatial niche differences.…”
Section: Spatial Nichementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Philodromus albidus is the smallest of the studied species and may be preyed upon by the other two species. In addition, a further study found indirect evidence of the influence of interspecific competition on the population of P. albidus from the other two philodromids (Michalko & Pekár, 2014). Thus, it is quite possible that the differentiation of spatial niche dimensions (some or all of them) reflected an effort on the part of P. albidus to avoid IGP and/or other forms of interspecific competition.…”
Section: Spatial Nichementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Ordinary least squares and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) were also used to test for the effect of days‐since‐flood on daily chlorophyll biomass. We used GLS models to analyse +P treatment effects using continuous AR1 correlation structures in the ‘nlme’ package of R, to account for the autocorrelated error associated with multiple sample points collected on the same day and at irregular intervals (Li & Baron, ; Pinheiro et al ., ; Michalko & Pekár, ). Since PO43 was added only during summer, but samples were taken throughout the open‐water season, we included both reach (treatment/reference) and SRP concentration as variables in our GLS models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possible explanation for the mean predatory activity-specific relationship between predictability and prey density is that individuals with different predatory activity might employ different prey-sampling strategy and/or possess different cognitive styles ( Mathot et al 2012 ; Sih and Del Giudice 2012 ). Individuals with low predatory activity can be choosy while the individuals with high predatory activity can be non-choosy ( Riechert 1991 ; Michalko and Pekár 2014 , 2017 ). Various prey represent different quality for generalist spiders, even at intra-specific level, and spiders are able to recognize that ( Toft 1999 ; Mayntz et al 2005 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%