1987
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Diabetes Mellitus a Teratogen or a Coteratogen?

Abstract: The risk of major and minor congenital malformations was compared in the offspring of diabetic (n = 2,639) and nondiabetic (n = 2,144) women who delivered at the Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, Maryland, between January 1, 1946 and December 31, 1970. In spite of ample power, there was little evidence of an increased malformation risk in offspring born prior to the onset of overt diabetes in the mother. In offspring born after onset, the overall malformation risk was not increased, but severe multi-organ b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In several other studies, researches have reported no increased risk of birth defects among infants born to mothers with gestational diabetes (5,13,21); in only a few studies have results indicated an increased risk (1,4,9). Our study shows that gestational diabetic mothers who required insulin during pregnancy were 1.9 times more likely to have an infant with a major birth defect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In several other studies, researches have reported no increased risk of birth defects among infants born to mothers with gestational diabetes (5,13,21); in only a few studies have results indicated an increased risk (1,4,9). Our study shows that gestational diabetic mothers who required insulin during pregnancy were 1.9 times more likely to have an infant with a major birth defect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…If the risk was a classic multifactoral trait, one would expect to see it symmetrically distributed from both mothers and fathers. More directly, McCarter et al 21 have shown no increased risk for major malformations in pregnancies of women that were conceived prior to the development of diabetes mellitus.…”
Section: Summary Of the Relationship Between Control And First-trimesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is well accepted that maternal diabetes is a major risk factor for CVMs and other serious birth defects [Mills, 1982;McCarter et al, 1987;Becerra et al, 1990;Ferencz et al, 1990;RamosArroyo et al, 1992] and that the greatest vulnerability is in early pregnancy [Mills et al, 1979;Reece et al, 1996]. These observations focus attention…”
Section: Maternal Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%