2010
DOI: 10.3758/bf03196682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is desynchrony tolerance adaptable in the perceptual organization of speech?

Abstract: Speech signal components that are desynchronized from the veridical temporal pattern lose intelligibility. In contrast, audiovisual presentations with large desynchrony in visible and audible speech streams are perceived without loss of integration. Under such conditions, the limit of desynchrony that permits audiovisual integration is also adaptable. A new project directly investigated the potential for adaptation to consistent desynchrony with unimodal auditory sine-wave speech. Listeners transcribed sentenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Error bars represent the 95% confidence interval for differences in desynchrony collapsing over synthesis rate. For comparison, a solid line with round bullets shows the performance reported by Remez et al (2010) on tests with the same desynchronies of the tone analog of the second formant of temporally veridical sine-wave sentences.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Error bars represent the 95% confidence interval for differences in desynchrony collapsing over synthesis rate. For comparison, a solid line with round bullets shows the performance reported by Remez et al (2010) on tests with the same desynchronies of the tone analog of the second formant of temporally veridical sine-wave sentences.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To meet this empirical aim, the items used in these tests were derived from materials originally created for Remez et al (2008; 2010) which sought to sharpen the indices of Greenberg and Arai (1998) and Silipo, Greenberg and Arai (1999). Fifteen sentences spoken by an adult male provided the natural samples from which the test items were produced.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Speech sounds, like other auditory signals, are short-lived. Classic speech perception studies have shown that very little of the auditory trace remains after 100 ms (Elliott 1962), with more recent studies indicating that much acoustic information already is lost after just 50 ms (Remez et al 2010). Similarly, and of relevance for the perception of sign language, studies of visual change detection suggest that the ability to maintain visual information beyond 60-70 ms is very limited (Pashler 1988).…”
Section: The Now-or-never Bottleneckmentioning
confidence: 99%