2005
DOI: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00674-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is desmoplasia a protective factor for survival in patients with colorectal carcinoma?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
20
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, changes in glycosylation and in the repertoire of glycans promote tumor cell invasion and distribution throughout the organism. 5 Processing leading to the modification and accumulation of ECM components in the lamina propria surrounding tumors (desmoplastic reaction) have been associated with both containment of tumor growth and invasion, 6,7 in addition to tumor progression and poor prognosis of colorectal carcinoma (CRC). 8,9 A unifying hypothesis might be that the desmoplastic reaction represents the initial defensive response of the host that then turn out in favor of neoplastic cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, changes in glycosylation and in the repertoire of glycans promote tumor cell invasion and distribution throughout the organism. 5 Processing leading to the modification and accumulation of ECM components in the lamina propria surrounding tumors (desmoplastic reaction) have been associated with both containment of tumor growth and invasion, 6,7 in addition to tumor progression and poor prognosis of colorectal carcinoma (CRC). 8,9 A unifying hypothesis might be that the desmoplastic reaction represents the initial defensive response of the host that then turn out in favor of neoplastic cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, desmoplasia has been associated with tumor progression and poor prognosis of colorectal carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, breast cancer and scirrhousgastric cancer (Breuninger et al 1997;Halvorsen and Seim 1989;Hasebe et al 2000;Yashiro et al 1996;Miura et al 1993). On the other hand, desmoplastic reaction has been suggested to lead to tumor regression (Martin et al 1987) and to be a protective factor for survival in patients with colorectal carcinoma (Caporale et al 2005). The College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999 states that desmoplasia has not been sufficiently studied to determine its prognostic value for colorectal cancer (Compton et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the physiological implications of this desmoplastic reaction remain to be fully established. Whilst some studies suggest that desmoplastic reaction is an adverse prognostic factor for colorectal cancer (Halvorsen and Seim 1989), others have debated its prognostic value due to insufficient evidence (Compton et al 2000) or see it as a protective factor for survival in patients with colorectal carcinoma (Caporale et al 2005). In this study, we have characterized ECM constituents of the colorectal cancer desmoplastic reaction (collagen types I, III, IV and V and SLRPs decorin, biglycan).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It is not known whether it gives to the tumoral cells a growth advantage or it is a reaction of the host to inhibit cancer cell progression. Caporale et al [25], studying desmoplasia in colorectal carcinoma, concluded that it may prevent cancer invasiveness by building a barrier against tumor diffusion. In salivary gland tumors, Sobral et al [26] showed greater desmoplasia in low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma when compared with high-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%